My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12-11-2017 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2017
>
12-11-2017 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/29/2019 11:13:20 AM
Creation date
5/29/2019 10:50:36 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
351
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />Monday, November 20, 2017 <br />6:30 o'clock p.m. <br />for a variance for the base of the garage and that the concrete and the floor was approved as part of the <br />building permit. <br />Curtis noted it was approved as a patio. <br />Wischmeier stated the patio as constructed is 3.3 feet too close to the cabin. <br />Thiesse stated the patio could have been up next to the house but it is the building that cannot be that <br />close. <br />Wischmeier stated the patio was being built for the express purpose of putting a garage on it but the <br />garage was not part of the building permit. Wischmeier stated he thought this was all part of the original <br />package and that he makes no excuses for it. The intent was that it was supposed to be conforming in <br />order to erect the garage onto the base and that his contractor clearly understood that was to be done. <br />Wischmeier pointed out the 6.7 foot setback. Wischmeier explained the drop in elevation is <br />approximately 12 feet, and that when they bought the lot, they thought it had a nice elevated area. <br />Unfortunately that area has very poor soils and a bunch of fill was brought in to raise it up. Wischmeier <br />stated the practical difficulties relate to the foundation and the extreme drop-off. Wischmeier indicated <br />they are attempting to make the structure compact to hide it the best they can from the lake and to get it <br />where there is good soil to pour the foundation. <br />Wischmeier stated the practical difficulty is the grade, and that getting to buildable soil for the garage <br />foundation was challenging, which is why the contractor moved towards the cabin. The challenge with <br />extending it four feet means that they will have to dig down a good way to get to flat soil, which results in <br />the whole foundation having to be shifted down three to four feet. Wischmeier stated the problem with <br />the backside of the garage is the way it is cut into the hill. Wischmeier noted the structure is not viewable <br />from the lake or from the neighbors' properties and that the issue with all of this was getting it to fit <br />proportionally with the house. Wischmeier indicated they tried to get it visually correct with the house <br />but that there is no practical way to build a structure like this that is correct and looks right from the front. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.