Laserfiche WebLink
AGENDA ITEM <br />Item No.: 16 Date: November 13, 2017 <br />Item Description: #17-3984 — City of Orono Text Amendment: Rental <br />Licensing, Vacation Rental Prohibition <br />Presenter: Jeremy Barnhart, Community Agenda Public Hearing <br />Development Director Section: <br />1. Purpose. The purpose of this action item is to gather public comment from residents relative to <br />possible changes to the City Code that would require licensing for rental properties, and to require a <br />minimum 30 day rental term. <br />2. Minnesota Statutes 15.99 Deadline. Not Applicable <br />3. Background/ Summary. At its meeting on October 9th, 2017, the council directed staff to move <br />forward on developing an ordinance to regulate short term rentals, and to also review potential to <br />develop an ordinance that would require rental licensing. The Council agreed that a listening session <br />should occur prior to adopting a final version of any regulations. <br />There are two main questions to be addressed as understood by staff. <br />Question 1: Should the city require licenses or similar city oversight in the rental of residential <br />units? The Met Council estimates there are approximately 400 rental properties in Orono (15% of all <br />households). Typically, a rental licensing program is established to address concerns with <br />overcrowding or substandard housing, and a licensing program requires inspections periodically, <br />ranging from every year to every 5 years. Staff is unaware of a life safety concern relative to <br />overcrowding or substandard housing. <br />Question 2. Should the City regulate short term rentals, i.e. rentals for a period of time less <br />than 30 days? The Council has a number of options in which to proceed: <br />a. Prohibit short term rentals, as Greenwood and Shorewood and other cities have done. <br />b. Require City Council approval of short term rentals, or they can have a tiered approval <br />system as Prior Lake and Stillwater have done. <br />c. Require some documentation, a permit or license that facilitates rapid response to complaints, <br />as was proposed in 2015 as Plymouth does. <br />d. Do nothing, determining that current regulations adequately address noise, traffic, and <br />parking, as Minnetonka does. <br />4. Public Comment. Postcards were mailed to 16 property owners notifying them of the meeting, <br />inviting comment. Do date, staff has received comment from two property owners; this email <br />correspondence is attached. <br />5. Staff Recommendation. Staff recommends receiving feedback, and directing staff to address <br />specific concerns in an ordinance. <br />COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED <br />Receive public comment, and direct, by motion, staff to amend city code as appropriate. <br />Exhibits <br />Exhibit A. Public comment received <br />Exhibit B. Mailing list <br />Prepared By: J. Barnhart <br />Reviewed By: -Sb)R <br />Approved By: -TV <br />