Laserfiche WebLink
FILE # 17-3966 <br />October 16, 2017 <br />Page 3 of 5 <br />subd. 2, when in harmony with this chapter. The board or the council may not permit as a <br />variance any use that is not permitted under this chapter for property in the zone where the <br />affected person's land is located. The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary <br />use of a one -family dwelling as a two-family dwelling. <br />According to MN §462.537 Subd. 6(2) variances shall only be permitted when: <br />1. The variance is in harmony with the general intent and purpose of the Ordinance. The lot <br />width and lot area variances requested are consistent with the general intent of the <br />Ordinance. The rear setback variance is in harmony with the purpose of the ordinance. <br />The lot includes challenges with the steep slope and the curved right of way limited the <br />building envelope of the property. <br />2. The variance is consistent with the comprehensive plan. The variances resulting in a <br />permit for construction of a single family residence in a residential zone are consistent <br />with the Comprehensive Plan. <br />3. The applicant establishes that there are practical difficulties. <br />a. The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not <br />permitted by the official controls; The request to permit construction of the <br />home on the substandard lot, in the proposed location within the rear yard <br />setback seems reasonable as the property is steep and could become hazardous <br />in the winter months if the garage is moved to meet the setback by creating a <br />longer and steeper driveway. <br />b. There are circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner; <br />The sub -standard size of the Property was not the result of actions by the <br />landowner. The location of the home with attached garage on the Property, the <br />steepness of the lot, the narrowness and shallow depth of the buildable area of <br />the property create difficulties for developing the Property and <br />C. The variance will not alter the essential character of the locality. The lot <br />area and width variances will not alter the character of the neighborhood. It <br />does not appear that the setback variances to permit the new home will <br />adversely impact the adjacent property owners. The neighboring parcel has a <br />home much closer to the road than it proposed. <br />Additionally City Code 78-123 provides additional parameters within which a variance may be <br />granted as follows: <br />4. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Economic <br />considerations have not been a factor in the variance approval determination. <br />5. Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight <br />for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth -sheltered construction as <br />defined in Minn. Stat. § 216C.06, subd. 2, when in harmony with Orono City Code Chapter <br />78. This condition is not applicable. <br />6. The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under <br />Orono City Code Chapter 78 for property in the zone where the affected person's land is <br />located. This condition is not applicable, as the use for a single family home is an allowed <br />use in the LR -1A District. <br />7. The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one -family dwelling <br />as a two-family dwelling. This condition is not applicable. <br />8. The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such <br />property or immediately adjoining property. The small building envelope with the <br />