Laserfiche WebLink
Council <br />MINUTES OF THE Exhibit C <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING #17-3966 <br />Monday, October 16, 2017 <br />6:30 o'clock p.m. <br />3. #17-3966 LDK BUILDERS ON BEHALF OF LINDA AND DARRELL TAMOSUINAS, <br />1525 LONG LAKE BOULEVARD, VARIANCES, 6:33 P.M. — 6:39 P.M. <br />Scott Koppandraye, LDK Builders, and Darrell and Linda Tamosuinas, Applicants, were present. <br />Oakden stated the applicant is requesting a rear yard setback variance, lot area and lot width variances in <br />order to build a new home that will be located 29.6 feet from the rear property line. The lot is <br />substandard. <br />The applicant plans to demolish the existing home and detached garage. The existing detached garage is <br />nonconforming due to its close proximity to the property line. Due to the contours of the lot, they are <br />requesting a rear yard setback variance to allow them to be 29.6 feet away from the street side of the lot <br />instead of the standard 50 feet, which is a 20.4 foot encroachment. The applicant states that positioning <br />the garage further away from the road creates issues with the downward slope of the driveway, creating a <br />hazard in the winter months. <br />Included in the memo is a lot analysis, which goes along with the setbacks required for this parcel. Also <br />included is an analysis of the practical difficulties. Staff finds that there are practical difficulties inherent <br />to the lot area, width and the rear setback. If the applicant wishes to do that in the future, they might <br />experience challenges as they are currently at 24.6 percent hardcover on the site, with the maximum <br />hardcover being 25 percent. The applicant is not requesting a hardcover variance as part of this <br />application. In addition, the lot poses multiple challenges with steepness on the lot and the curved road <br />creates a small building envelope. <br />The applicant will need to address how water will be managed on the site so it will not direct water to any <br />neighboring properties. <br />Staff finds the requested variances to be reasonable and recommends approval contingent on submittal of <br />an updated grading plan to ensure water will not be directed onto neighboring properties. <br />The Planning Commission had no questions for Staff. <br />