My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-27-2017 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2017
>
11-27-2017 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/29/2019 10:18:50 AM
Creation date
5/29/2019 10:12:36 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
167
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, November 13, 2017 <br />7:00 o'clock p.m. <br />16. #17-3984 — CITY OF ORONO TEXT AMENDMENT: RENTAL LICENSING, <br />VACATION RENTAL PROHIBITION — Continued <br />Printup noted Orono is also a low service community, which helps keep taxes low. Printup stated the <br />answer to the primary problem has an easy solution, which is not to allow it. <br />Walsh stated in his view transient is an issue, because once it is allowed, the word will get out there and <br />people will buy homes on the lake so they can rent them out. Walsh stated long-term rentals tend to be <br />more stable. <br />Dankey commented there a lot of people who used to live in this area that come back here for the <br />weekend to attend weddings and other events or just to see people. <br />Seals asked what will happen with the current rentals. <br />Mattick stated they would not be grandfathered in and that he would encourage the City Council to deal <br />with it through licensing. Mattick stated the concept of grandfathering is more of a zoning issue and this <br />would be more akin to a business license. <br />Crosby stated in his view there should be some time before the new rules take effect so the current rental <br />properties can make the transition. <br />Walsh stated it will be at least January before something gets approved. <br />Seals asked why it needs to be 30 days. <br />Crosby stated if someone has to come here to relocate for a job, that would be a reasonable thing since <br />they would eventually become entrenched in the community. Crosby stated someone who comes her for <br />the weekend or a day is not going to become part of the community. <br />Walsh stated other communities have gone with 30 days and that it appears to be working pretty well for <br />them. Walsh stated the City can get the new ordinance on the books and then tweak it. <br />Crosby commented he would be okay with the exception on the homestead properties renting out a room. <br />Printup noted this is not unique to Orono and that it is happening across the nation. <br />It was the consensus of the City Council that some type of license be required and that the property owner <br />should be allowed two strikes before they lose their license for a period of time. <br />Seals stated a violation call could also result in another charge and the fee could be based on the number <br />of rooms being rented out. <br />Walsh stated he does not want to get into the weeds on the specific rules but that they can get a basic <br />structure in place. Walsh stated he does not want to tell the rental property owners what to do but that <br />they need a license. <br />Crosby stated the licensing fee would also help cover some of the City's costs. <br />Page 9 of 17 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.