My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-25-2017 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2017
>
09-25-2017 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/29/2019 8:28:02 AM
Creation date
5/29/2019 8:22:30 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
189
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
CITY OF ORONO <br />RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br />NO. <br />objectives and preservation goals of the Comprehensive Plan. This criterion is not <br />met. <br />4. "Variances may be granted when the applicant for the variance establishes that there <br />are practical difficulties in complying with the zoning ordinance. `Practical difficulties,' <br />as used in connection with the granting of a variance, means that: <br />a. The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not <br />permitted by the official controls; <br />The official controls require a minimum acreage and width for each newly <br />created building lot. The Proposed Development does not meet the minimum <br />standards for acreage. This criterion is not met. <br />b. There are circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner; <br />The size of the Property was not created by the landowner however it is not <br />unique. There are many properties which exceed the minimum acreage <br />requirement, yet are not able to subdivide because they do not have twice the <br />minimum lot size. The 1 acre lot size is a minimum standard and is not meant <br />to guarantee a property owner that they will be allowed to subdivide their <br />property simply because they have more than 1 acre in land. The purchase price <br />of the Property was determined by landowner and is not unique. This criterion <br />is not met, and <br />c. The variance will not alter the essential character of the locality. <br />The Proposed Development will be used as a residential lot. <br />5. "Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Economic <br />considerations have been identified as the most relevant factor in the variance <br />request by the Applicant." In the Applicant's practical difficulties statement, they <br />indicate that the Property was purchased "at a premium at public auction" and <br />identified this as "a factor" in their practical difficulty determination. The purchase <br />price of the Property is not a valid practical difficulty. The Applicant has stated that <br />the Proposed Development is more economically viable if he is allowed to build two <br />homes valued at under $1,000,000 rather than a single home valued at more than <br />$1,000,000. The purchase price of the Property and the marketability of the land is <br />the primary reason for the variance request. This criterion is not met. <br />6. "Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct <br />sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth -sheltered <br />construction as defined in Minn. Stat. § 216C.06, subd. 2, when in harmony with <br />Orono City Code Chapter 78." This condition is not applicable. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.