My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-25-2017 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2017
>
09-25-2017 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/29/2019 8:28:02 AM
Creation date
5/29/2019 8:22:30 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
189
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, September 11, 207 <br />7:00 o'clock p.m. <br />18. NAVARRE AREA PLAN — INITIAL CITY MEETING — Continued <br />Seals stated she likes the concept of residential on top. <br />Barnhart stated Staff would like to use this plan in forming the Comprehensive Plan Update and that he <br />would recommend they look at general commercial and general multi -family as is it realistic. Barnhart <br />stated some of the businesses are more driven by population or density and would not be realistic for this <br />area. Barnhart stated there are probably more possibilities for multi -family and general commercial. <br />Walsh stated he would default to that. <br />Rief stated he would agree based on his experience. Rief stated the hardest issue with redevelopment is <br />the cost and density also plays a factor in redevelopment. <br />Seals asked if the City is potentially looking at acquiring some vacant parcels that are adjacent to the lake. <br />Dankey commented the parcel behind Navarre Electric is an awkward access to the lake. <br />Printup noted the area behind the bowling alley is a holding pond. <br />Seals stated there appear to be a couple of areas where access might be possible. <br />Barnhart stated he heard the City Council likes the idea but that they are not sure how to achieve that at <br />this time and that WSB will look at that. <br />Mezio stated they are looking for whether this is an idea that captures the Council's attention and whether <br />it could be a possible income generator for the City. Mezio stated if it is something the City is interested <br />in, they will look into it. <br />Printup stated he would say no then since there is access in Spring Park which is close by. <br />Barnhart stated he was not envisioning boat access but perhaps more of a visual connection. Barnhart <br />stated in his view it is worth exploring. <br />Walsh commented the residents would be better able to answer that. <br />Schwaber stated if some of these properties are redeveloped, it could potentially become more of a place <br />like Lord Fletcher's and that there are a number of ways the community could interact with the lake. <br />Schwaber stated they would like to document those as well as get the feedback from the community. <br />Schwaber stated as it relates to the market study, they will gather some general information on <br />commercial and multi -family units but that it will not be broken down into type. Schwaber stated the <br />study will also provide some idea of what the market will support as well as a timeline. <br />Schwaber stated the small area plan would be a failure if there was not resident input. Schwaber stated in <br />looking at some of the previous plan efforts, he does not feel there were good implementation plans, and <br />that he would like to hear from the City Council about any drop -dead issues they would like to see <br />addressed. <br />Page 15 of 17 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.