Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, September 11, 207 <br />7:00 o'clock p.m. <br />16. #17-3962 LAKE WEST DEVELOPMENT, LCC, O/B/O RICK AND BARBARA <br />LUPIENT, PIDs 20-117-23-0001/0002/0003 (Lots 1, 2 and 3 Casco Point Addition) "Ivy Place" <br />PRELIMINARY PLAT — RESOLUTION NO. 6789 <br />Barnhart reviewed his Staff report dated September 11, 2017, regarding a preliminary plat request to <br />replat an existing three lot parcel into two buildable lots and one outlot for access. The lots would meet <br />the requirements for lot size, lot area, and provide adequate building areas within setbacks. <br />The Planning Commission recommended approval on a vote of 7-0. The Commission requested <br />additional information be submitted regarding the amount of fill and verification of the condition of Ivy <br />Place prior to construction. <br />Public comment received at the Planning Commission meeting were generally in opposition to the <br />proposal and related mainly to additional stormwater entering the lake and onto adjacent parcels, the <br />driveway being too close to the lake, a lack of turn -around for the traffic within the existing right-of-way <br />for Ivy Place, traffic safety concerns due to its narrow width, and wetland impacts. <br />Staff recommends approval subject to a number of conditions outlined in Staff's report. <br />Seals asked whether there are any things that can be done to mitigate those items to address the public's <br />concerns. <br />Barnhart stated the driveway serving both lots is proposed to be 12 feet wide. City ordinance allows for <br />an 8 -foot wide driveway within the 75 -foot area for one lot. The 12 -foot width was the minimum <br />suggested by the Fire Department and Staff feels it is the minimum amount of hardcover to provide <br />access to the two lots. <br />Barnhart stated the challenge with rain gardens or other types of mitigation is that while those sound great <br />the first year, yearly maintenance is required or they will not be as effective. Barnhart noted the applicant <br />is proposing two underground stormwater retention vessels, which is unusual for a single-family <br />neighborhood. Given the amount of discussion from the neighboring property owner expressing concerns <br />about drainage from this property onto their property, Staff will perform a thorough review to ensure that <br />this project does not add to the runoff. Barnhart noted the homes are at the bottom of the hill so there will <br />be some runoff regardless if this project goes forward or not. In addition, a review will be done as part of <br />final plat. <br />Printup asked whether it should be noted in the resolution that the condition of the driveway will be <br />verified or whether that would be included in the right-of-way. <br />Barnhart stated that should be spelled out and that Staff will add that. <br />Dankey asked if bringing the fill in by boat is an option. <br />Barnhart indicated the applicant could better address that but it is likely other environmental impacts <br />would be introduced. <br />Dankey noted the Casco Point Road is a one-way in and a one-way out and that any damage would <br />impact all the residents. <br />Page 10 of 17 <br />