Laserfiche WebLink
17-3948 <br />July 17, 2017 <br />Page 6 of 7 <br />Conservation Design <br />While the property is technically subject to the City's Conservation Design Ordinance, it is suggested that <br />due to the small size and open nature of the property, a Conservation Design Inventory and Master Plan is <br />unnecessary; Planning Commission should address this topic in its discussion. <br />Archaeological Site Proximity <br />Staff is unaware of any archaeological sites within the property; the applicant should contact the State <br />Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) to confirm. <br />Conditional Use Permit <br />Applicable Regulation: Conditional Use Permit (Section 78-916) <br />The Planning Commission may recommend and the Council may grant a Conditional Use Permit <br />(CUP) as the use permit was applied for or in modified form. On the basis of the application and the <br />evidence submitted, the city must find that the proposed use at the proposed location is or will be: <br />1) Consistent with the community management plan; The Community Management plan <br />maps the site for office use. The Commission is considering an amendment to the <br />Community Management Plan, if approved the use would be consistent. <br />2) Compliant with the zoning code, including any conditions imposed on specific uses as <br />required by article V, division 3 of the City Code; The proposed rezoning to RPUD would <br />allow for consistency with use regulations. <br />3) Adequately served by police, fire, roads, and stormwater management; The property was laid <br />out to accommodate an office use. <br />4) Provided with an adequate water supply and sewage disposal system; The property is served <br />by municipal water and sanitary sewer <br />5) Not expected to generate excessive demand for public services at public cost; No additional <br />public service costs associated with the proposed use are anticipated. <br />6) Compatible with the surrounding area as the area is used both presently and as it is planned to <br />be used in the future; The adjoining properties to the north are high density residential; to <br />the south and west are commercial. To the east across a stormwater pond is vacant, <br />commercial land. The proposed quasi commercial residential use appears to be <br />consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. <br />7) Consistent with the character of the surrounding area, unless a change of character is called for <br />in the community management plan; An amendment to the Community Management Plan <br />would allow the proposed use. Compatible with the character of buildings and site <br />improvements in the surrounding area, unless a change of character is called for in the <br />community management plan; The existing building has both commercial and residential <br />characteristics and its location and design make it compatible with the surrounding <br />residential and commercial uses. <br />8) Not expected to substantially impair the use and enjoyment of the property in the area or have <br />a materially adverse impact on the property values in the area when compared to the <br />impairment or impact of generally permitted uses; No evidence has been presented to <br />suggest otherwise. <br />9) Provided with screening and buffering adequate to mitigate undesirable views and activities <br />likely to disturb surrounding uses; Adhering to the RPUD landscaping requirements will <br />provide for adequate screening. <br />10) Not create a nuisance which generates smoke, noise, glare, vibration, odors, fumes, dust, <br />electrical interference, general unsightliness, or other means; No evidence has been <br />presented to suggest otherwise. <br />