My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-14-2017 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2017
>
08-14-2017 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/29/2019 8:22:04 AM
Creation date
5/29/2019 8:08:47 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
422
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />Monday, July 17, 2017 <br />6:30 o'clock p.m. <br />Thiesse noted Hennepin County has a 100 -foot right-of-way and that they would likely construct any trail <br />within that. <br />Barnhart stated the developer would pay the City's portion of the trail, and if it is located on this property, <br />Hennepin County would pay for the trail. Barnhart stated the City can accept a rooftop seating area but <br />that he does not believe a public trail would meet the 10 percent private recreation area. <br />Thiesse noted the Planning Commission discussed Item No. 5 and that they feel the Conservation Design <br />requirements should be waived. <br />Schoenzeit asked whether any precedent would be set by allowing 3.5 acres rather than 5 acres for the <br />RPUD. <br />Barnhart stated the RPUD standards have minimum requirements and that they have different stipulations <br />that could be applied. Number two of the development standards states the property is directly adjacent to <br />or across a public street from property which has been developed previously as an RPUD, which would <br />apply in this case. Barnhart stated the City has also seen some projects in the past, such as Shadywood <br />Villa, where the Council did grant a waiver, and that he does not believe they would be creating any <br />precedent. <br />Lemke stated he has a concern with the amount of massing without a break. <br />Thiesse commented the recesses and offsets help him feel better about the massing. <br />Schoenzeit noted they are also stepping back the second level and adding some patio areas, which could <br />help break up the fagade. <br />Larry Schultz asked about the stormwater pond having runoff from Highway 112. <br />Barnhart stated Hennepin County is eying a portion of the subject property to accommodate expansion of <br />the pond. Barnhart indicated a portion of the stormwater from Wayzata Boulevard will be fed into the <br />existing pond, which requires a bigger pond, but that flooding is rather remote. <br />Page 10 of 11 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.