My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-14-2017 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2017
>
08-14-2017 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/29/2019 8:22:04 AM
Creation date
5/29/2019 8:08:47 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
422
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />Monday, July 17, 2017 <br />6:30 o'clock p.m. <br />Landgraver suggested the applicant do a parking table for the City Council. <br />Lemke asked why there was not a second entrance. <br />Gori stated the main reason for not having a second entrance was circulation and wanting to avoid <br />causing confusion with two entrances. Gori stated he understands planning staff usually likes to see one <br />entrance in and out. Gori noted this facility will not generate traffic on the scale of an office building and <br />that other similar projects he has worked on usually only have one entrance/exit. <br />Larry Schultz, 2670 Kelley Parkway, stated as he looks at the plan, he sees Kelley Parkway going through <br />there and that he sees parking spots facing Kelley Parkway. Schultz asked whether there will be any <br />amenities or trees or foliage so there will be a buffer between Kelley Parkway and the parking lot. <br />Barnhart noted Kelley Parkway is north of the site and that there are some trees between Kelley Parkway <br />and the parking lot. Barnhart stated there are trees also along Kelley Parkway that are not shown on the <br />plan. Barnhart stated the intent with the landscaping was not to screen the building. <br />Thiesse commented it would be no different than the parking spots in front of the condominiums. <br />Schultz asked how far back the building would be from Kelley. <br />Barnhart stated the distance between the corner of the building and the driveway is 44 feet, with Kelley <br />Parkway being another 15 feet beyond that. Barnhart stated to his understanding it is 65 feet to the curb. <br />Thiesse noted Item No. 5 in Staff's report asks whether the Conservation Design requirements should be <br />waived. Thiesse asked whether the Planning Commission can encourage the applicant to plant some <br />trees. <br />Barnhart stated in his view a Conservation Plan is not necessary but that the Planning Commission can <br />recommend some additional trees be planted. <br />Page 8 of 11 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.