Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />Monday, August 21, 2017 <br />6:30 o'clock p.m. <br />for the walls. Staff is suggesting approval of the project with screening of all of the retaining walls being <br />required to preserve the natural look of the shoreline when viewed from the lake. <br />The Planning Commission should discuss the issues outlined in Staff's report. <br />The Planning Staff recommends approval of the variance with the following conditions: <br />Submittal of engineered plans with the building permit application; <br />2. Approval applicable permits from the MCWD; <br />Vegetative screening plan to provide a natural looking slope when viewed from the lake; and <br />4. Removal of the wall directly above the rip -rap or, if the wall is necessary to the stability of the <br />slope, the applicant should provide justification and a revised plan which allows for vegetative <br />screening of the bottom wall without justification. Staff recommends denial of this wall. <br />Oakden played a short animated video of what is being proposed by the applicant. <br />The Planning Commission had no questions for Staff. <br />Dale Gustafson, Developer, stated he completed the design of the project and that he is fine with the <br />recommendations of Staff. <br />Thiesse asked if there is justification for the sea wall. <br />Gustafson indicated it is commonly called a curve wall, with the curve of the wall being within the range <br />of where the MCWD says the rip -rap should be. Gustafson stated whenever there is a steep bank, the rip - <br />rap is placed at a low angle so it does not get pushed up the hill. Putting boulders on the edge of that will <br />get you to the edge of the bank. Gustafson stated the reason for the wall on the right-hand side that <br />appears in one photograph to be back a few feet is in the area where it is all dirt. The other photograph <br />