My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-11-2017 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2017
>
09-11-2017 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/29/2019 8:02:13 AM
Creation date
5/29/2019 7:49:04 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
242
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
#17-3962 <br />August 21, 2017 <br />Page 4 of 6 <br />on the lake side. The home at 3560 Ivy appears to be 35 feet from the lake. Because the survey indicates <br />that 3560 Ivy does not abut the lake on the lagoon side, there would be no average lakeshore setback on <br />the lagoon side. Since any new homes on Lots 1 and 2 must be at least 75' from the shore, staff would <br />suggest that 75 feet become the required average setback regardless of which of Lots 1 or 2 is built on first. <br />Access and Standards <br />Access to the site is via a road easement that extends through 3560 Ivy Place, from the northern terminus <br />of Ivy Place. An existing driveway easement (Document 1023891) will be vacated and replaced with a 30 <br />foot wide Outlot A, serving both Lots 1 and 2. Outlot A will be located within the 75' lake yard, but generally <br />outside of the Drainage and Shore Stabilization (D/SS) Easement (Document T5010662), illustrated on sheet <br />C0.2. A portion of the Outlot will unavoidably encroach into this easement because the existing road <br />easement terminates into the D/SS easement. <br />While establishment of a cul-de-sac or more functional turnaround at the end of Ivy Place would be <br />desirable, there is not sufficient room to accomplish that within existing right-of-way. Acquisition of <br />additional right-of-way from the applicants' property would seem to be of marginal value given the <br />configuration of the property and the close proximity of the lakeshore. Whether the addition of two new <br />homes at the end of this street will cause future maintenance, service vehicle or emergency services issues <br />is a point for discussion, to be addressed by the pertinent service providers (Public Works, Police, Fire). <br />The neighboring property owner has raised concerns with access, outlined in the letter dated May 1, 2017, <br />attached as Exhibit J. The applicant's attorney has responded in a letter dated August 4, 2017, attached as <br />exhibit L. The city is not in the position to arbitrate the access question. <br />Wetlands on Site and/or Impacted <br />A very small wetland was delineated within existing Lot 3. The applicant proposes the filling of this wetland, <br />triggering the Watershed District's review, which includes a 14 day public comment period. Watershed <br />approval of wetland mitigation must be achieved prior to preliminary plat approval, it is recommended that <br />this item not be placed on the City Council's agenda until this review is complete. <br />The proposed beaches impact the wetlands beyond diminimuos limits. If the beaches are removed, the <br />wetland may be filled without mitigation. <br />Per the Watershed District. a wetland buffer of 25 feet will be required. The city requires a setback of 10 <br />feet from the buffer for structures and hardcover. The wetland along the shore line and its buffer/ setback <br />impact the proposed driveway at the extreme south end of the parcel. A wetland variance will be necessary <br />for the driveway. <br />Floodplain Alteration <br />Filling activities exceeding 500 cubic yards in the Shoreland require a conditional use permit. Further, <br />filling activities which exceed 1,000 cubic yards of imported material within the floodplain requires review <br />of a conditional use permit. The Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD) will be reviewing the <br />proposed grading and mitigation plan to assure the overall volume of flood storage has not been <br />diminished. The lowest floor of the proposed home must be at or above the Regulatory Flood Protection <br />Elevation (RFPE) for Lake Minnetonka which is 932.5 feet; the MCWD's regulations require low openings <br />to be one foot higher at 933.5 feet. The proposed concept plan suggests a first floor elevation of 934.00. <br />The Watershed district has requested additional information to verify floodplain regulations are met, their <br />comments are provided as Exhibit I. <br />Conservation Design. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.