My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-11-2017 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2017
>
09-11-2017 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/29/2019 8:02:13 AM
Creation date
5/29/2019 7:49:04 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
242
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />Monday, August 21, 2017 <br />6:30 o'clock p.m. <br />Jay White noted the house will also be 1.5 feet higher than their home 15 feet away and that they would <br />request some consideration be given to an additional side setback. <br />Tera White stated their other concern is that they have not heard any sort of plan regarding the sewer and <br />gas encroachments. White stated in 1970 the sewer went in but that it is not within their property and is <br />an encroachment. White commented they do not know where to put it, nor do they want to incur the cost <br />of that since they just installed a new driveway and it would have to be ripped up if the lines were <br />relocated. White commented the project seems to be very impactful to them and that they have concerns <br />about that. White stated the utilities were allowed to be installed on land they did not believe would be <br />buildable and was not their choice. <br />Jay White noted it was considered wetland two years ago. White stated in regards to access, a 12 -foot <br />driveway would put it within two feet of the lake and that he is not sure how a truck would get through <br />there. White stated at the last meeting the City had suggested barging in a lot of the fill and equipment <br />and that they would support that rather than having huge trucks coming up a private driveway and making <br />that turn. <br />Tera White stated they also back up the driveway to make that turn and that they have encountered people <br />coming down the hill as they are backing up. White commented they would now be adding two other <br />families with possible multiple drivers, which would add to the congestion. <br />Jay White commented there are safety concerns associated with that. White stated since it will not be a <br />public road so the City is not considering making any improvements. White noted there is no agreement <br />concerning the driveway and that he would ask the Planning Commission to consider whether it would be <br />better for only one home to be built. White stated in their view adding two home would not be safe. <br />As it relates to the outlot, White stated that will end up being a private shared driveway off of their <br />driveway and not dedicated as a public road. White commented he is not sure if a variance is needed or <br />how it works, but the subject lot has no hardship. White stated the access should go directly to the <br />setback and that they are using the outlot to create the two homes and that there will be a lot of hardcover <br />in the impact area. <br />Page 6 of 19 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.