My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-11-2017 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2017
>
09-11-2017 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/29/2019 8:02:13 AM
Creation date
5/29/2019 7:49:04 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
242
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
FILE # 17-3963 <br />21 Aug 2017 <br />Page 2 of 5 <br />location of Lot 1, the Tier 3 (35%) hardcover limitations will likely apply. <br />Applicable Regulations: <br />Lot Area Variance (Section 78-330) <br />The applicant is requesting a variance from the minimum lot area standards in order to create an <br />additional buildable lot. The LR -113 one family lakeshore residential zoning district requires one <br />contiguous dry/upland acre for each buildable lot created. This development would create one <br />conforming 1.0 acre lot, and one 0.67 acre lot. <br />Comprehensive Plan Land Use Guidi <br />The property is within the LR -113 one family lakeshore residential district which requires a minimum <br />size of one acre and 140 feet in width per lot. There are lots in this district which are substandard in <br />size although many meet or exceed the 1.0 acre requirement. According to the Comprehensive Plan <br />(CMP) Map 36-13, attached as Exhibit E, the Low -Medium Density category includes virtually all single- <br />family properties in the 1/2 -acre and 1 -acre zones (LR -1C and LR -113). The "Low -Medium Density" <br />category was incorporated into the CMP for two reasons: 1) to reflect that a majority of the Low - <br />Medium Density area was historically subdivided into smaller lots than the zoning minimums, in a <br />majority of cases many decades before the current zoning came into effect in 1975; and 2) to satisfy <br />the Met Council's demand that Orono establish density categories rather than merely zoning districts <br />(but then they only credit us with the lowest density in the range when determining whether we <br />meet their density goals). <br />The CMP provides guidance to the city in adopting ordinances and policies to achieve the goals and <br />vision of the City. Based on the guidance of the CMP, the city adopted zoning regulations <br />establishing minimum lot sizes, including for the subject parcel. The "Low -Medium Density" category <br />was not intended to suggest that City would change the zoning to allow creation of new lots that are <br />substandard based on their respective existing zoning. Only twice since 1975 has the City allowed <br />the creation of new lots with substandard lot area; both in the 2 -acre zones and both for what can <br />only be considered political reasons - elimination of the Stubbs Bay Marina in 1980 which allowed <br />creation of three small lakeshore lots as a concession to the marina owner; and creation of one 1 - <br />acre lot at the east end of Fox Street (1985-ish) in relation to expediting the Minnetonka Bluffs sewer <br />project. In every other instance where we have developed lots smaller than the zoning, they have <br />either been via a rezoning or via the PRD process. Via PRD we have always required that the <br />underlying density still be met overall by the creation of open space outlots. <br />Conservation Design (Section 78-1632) <br />According to the Code, the Conservation Design Master Planning requirements apply to all proposed <br />residential subdivisions or multi -unit residential developments greater than five acres in total area or <br />guided for urban density (greater than one unit per two acres). The property meets the urban <br />density guidance trigger, therefore a conservation design plan is required. The applicant has <br />requested a waiver of this requirement (see Exhibit F). <br />Governing Regulation: Variance (Section 78-123) <br />In reviewing applications for variance, the Planning Commission shall consider the effect of the <br />proposed variance upon the health, safety and welfare of the community, existing and anticipated <br />traffic conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, and the effect on values of <br />property in the surrounding area. The Planning Commission shall consider recommending approval for <br />variances from the literal provisions of the Zoning Code in instances where their strict enforcement <br />would cause practical difficulties because of circumstances unique to the individual property under <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.