My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-11-2017 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2017
>
09-11-2017 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/29/2019 8:02:13 AM
Creation date
5/29/2019 7:49:04 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
242
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />Monday, August 21, 2017 <br />6:30 o'clock p.m. <br />Staff provided a practical difficulty analysis within the Staff report. Tonight the applicant should be <br />asked to discuss the practical difficulties supporting their variance request. Staff's analysis found that the <br />applicant failed to satisfy all of the practical difficulties necessary to grant the variance, which is also <br />necessary in order to approve the subdivision. The City has historically not created substandard lots <br />without a rezoning or PRD process. <br />Staff did speak with one neighbor who was not in support of the variance and/or subdivision of the <br />property. This neighbor further stated their concern was the lack of regulation preventing the type of <br />construction the applicant has identified on 940 North Arm Drive. A comment letter from another <br />neighbor was received today and has been distributed to the Planning Commission. <br />Curtis noted the home on 940 North Arm Drive was constructed in accordance with the minimum <br />building code standards. The City does not and may not have a prohibition on any of the different home <br />or construction types which meet the building code. Staff suggests the City Council may want to explore <br />the regulations which govern construction types or minimum construction standards relating to minimum <br />size and/or width of homes. Specifically if the placement of mobile homes on properties within the City <br />is a concern. <br />The Planning Commission should consider one of the following motions: <br />1. Approval of the lot area variance in order to create a new substandard buildable lot and approval <br />of the Class III subdivision to create a total of two buildable lots where one lot currently exists. <br />If the Planning Commission finds variance approval appropriate, the applicant should be directed <br />regarding the waiver of the conservation design requirements. <br />2. The alternative motion to be considered by the Planning Commission tonight is denial of the <br />variance; thereby denying the subdivision request. <br />The Planning Commission had no questions for Staff. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.