My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-28-2017 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2017
>
08-28-2017 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/28/2019 4:59:52 PM
Creation date
5/28/2019 4:55:52 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
107
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, August 14, 2017 <br />7:00 o'clock p.m. <br />10. #17-3948 APEX HOLDINGS, LLC, 2635 KELLEY PARKWAY CUP SENIOR HOUSING <br />PROJECT, COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT, REZONING AND <br />PRELIMINARY MASTER PLAN, FINAL PLAT — Continued <br />Gori stated it was brought up in a discussion with City Staff. <br />Barnhart stated it is not uncommon to have a limit on the number of residential units due to the <br />infrastructure in the ground, which is probably where it came from. <br />Walsh stated if that number is based on current capacity, it would be good to know a specific number in <br />order to maximize the density. <br />Barnhart indicated he will look into that. Barnhart stated every use buys a certain amount of capacity <br />through SAC units and that the applicant may need to purchase more SAC units. Barnhart stated the <br />other side of the equation is the density, which are the 48 units that would be counted towards the density. <br />Walsh asked if they are using the SAC charges that would have been charged to the office building. <br />Barnhart stated it is likely the proposed building would need to pay more SAC units. <br />Walsh stated the City Council will need to know that number. <br />Barnhart indicated he is looking for direction from the City Council on whether they support the proposal <br />generally. Barnhart stated the applicant should then submit a revised plan showing the memory care <br />meeting the density requirements and that Staff will look into the SAC charges. <br />Walsh stated one of the other items recommended is the addition of another curb cut, which makes sense. <br />Walsh asked why the hardcover is at 63 percent. Walsh asked if the building pad and parking accounts <br />for the majority of that. Walsh commented Staff did not seem to have a problem with that based on the <br />use. <br />Barnhart stated he does not have a problem with the 63 percent and that there is not wall to wall <br />pavement. Barnhart stated there is some green space proposed, but the fact that it is an RPUD means <br />there is a 50 percent hardcover limit. <br />Walsh stated the 63 percent hardcover allows the developer to increase the building pad. <br />Walsh stated he would not be opposed to the patio areas for the residents being included to get to the 1 I <br />percent. <br />It was the consensus of the City Council to include those private recreational areas in the calculation. <br />Printup asked where Hennepin County wants to construct the trail along Old Highway 12. <br />Barnhart stated to his understanding the plans have not been finalized but that it will either be on the north <br />side of Wayzata Boulevard or per the original Stonebay development agreement. <br />Page 6 of 13 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.