Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, August 14, 2017 <br />7:00 o'clock p.m. <br />9. #17-3945 WILLIAM AND SUE DUNKLEY, 2709 WALTERS PORT LANE AND <br />2710 PENCE LANE — SKETCH PLAN — Continued <br />of Pence Lane will be widened. Vogstrom indicated they are attempting to preserve the beautiful <br />driveway by limiting the width to 25 feet. <br />Sue Dunkley noted a wider road would also interfere with the wetlands in the area. <br />Vogstrom indicated they are working with the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District on the wetlands. <br />Walsh recommended the road agreements be formalized and that he would defer to the police and fire <br />departments on the turning radius of the road. <br />Chief Van Eyll stated this will be a big improvement over what currently exists. <br />Walsh asked if anyone from the public would like to comment on the sketch plan. <br />Greg Hueller, 2715 Pence Lane, stated the driveway runs through more property than just 2710 Pence and <br />that it also runs through Lot 8, which is owned by tenants in common. Hueller stated each property <br />owner has a one-third undivided interest in that property and that the Dunkleys' rights are limited to <br />access for utilities for the benefit of the Dunkley's new lot only and that there are no rights to use Lot 8 <br />for a driveway or other purposes for the benefit of their existing house since it is a separate property. <br />Hueller stated the Dunkleys would require the approval of all the owners of Lot 8 to be able to expand the <br />use of Lot 8 to benefit their current property. <br />Hueller indicated he is inclined to agree with the proposal but that they will need to come to an agreement <br />on certain matters. Hueller noted the Dunkleys want to create Outlot A for possible sale and that <br />currently that area helps maintain his privacy. Hueller stated he was not aware of this plan when he <br />purchased their house recently. Hueller indicated he has had some preliminary discussions about the <br />arrangement but that they have not come to any final terms. <br />Hueller requested the City Council consider this sketch plan and ask that any formal approvals be <br />conditioned about confirming that a mutual agreement has been reached, including the splitting off a <br />portion of Dunkleys' new property, adding it to his property, and amending the driveway easements to <br />allow for a driveway over Lot 8. Hueller stated otherwise the Dunkleys are not legally permitted to use <br />that sketch of driveway for access to their current property. If the Dunkleys cannot use that stretch of <br />driveway, the project does not work. Hueller indicated he would like to work with the Dunkleys and <br />come to some type of agreement. <br />Walsh stated if there is a legal basis, the City really does not have any role in that and that it would need <br />to be an agreement between the parties. Walsh stated if that remains to be an issue, the City would not be <br />able to approve the plan, but at this point the three property owners will need to come to some type of <br />agreement. <br />Seals asked if the City Council can do anything at this point without an agreement. <br />Walsh noted this is a sketch plan review and that the City Council is being asked to comment on the <br />proposal. <br />Page 3 of 13 <br />