Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, July 24, 2017 <br />7:00 o'clock p.m. <br />16. WAYZATA BOULEVARD (CSAR 112) PHASE 2 DESIGN APPROVAL —Continued <br />cut at Old Long Lake Road that would be shared by 1010, 1020, 1030 and 1070, with a 2 -foot concrete <br />section to delineate the driveways of 1010, 1020, and 1030 from the driveway of 1070. This option was <br />presented by the county in February of 2017. Davidson stated their understanding is that this would mean <br />that the driveways would be privately maintained with the concrete strip down the middle serving as a <br />divider. <br />Option 3 proposed two completely separate driveways also approximately 75 feet in length. One <br />driveway would serve 1010, 1020, and 1030, and a separate driveway would serve 1070. This was <br />presented in March of 2017. <br />Davidson stated Option 4, which is the option that was discussed at the work session this evening, is very <br />similar to Option 2. It would have a single curb cut with a relatively large apron that is approximately 60' <br />x 18' that would serve all four properties. The shared slab would lead to two approximately 25 feet <br />separated driveways, one for 1070 and then one for 1010, 1020, and 1030. <br />Davidson stated historically 1010, 1020 and 1030 are properties that were divided away from 1070 back <br />in 1985. Those three properties have shared a driveway since that time and there is a legal maintenance <br />agreement on file. Davidson stated there is a long precedent for how the driveway is managed. Davidson <br />noted the house at 1070 is not part of that shared driveway and her legal advisors have stated that there is <br />an unknown risk of marrying the two driveways so they would like to keep that separate. Davidson stated <br />1070 is also a very large property that could be subdivided at some point in the future. <br />Davidson stated the unanimous conclusion of the neighbors is that they would prefer either Option 2 or <br />Option 3, with wide enough emergency vehicle access, or Option 4, but with revision to address <br />separation of ownership of the driveways. Davidson stated they are asking that the shared pad section of <br />Option 4 be made a public road. That public road would be under the jurisdiction of Orono and the <br />government, either Long Lake or Orono, would put that road on their pavement plan and would snow <br />plow that section so the four properties would not have to bear the cost of maintaining such a large road <br />bed. Each of the 25 -foot sections that come off of that public road would be maintained by the respective <br />property owners. <br />Davidson requested that Orono, Long Lake, and the county make sure that if Option 4 is chosen that the <br />shared slab is designated a public road forever. Davidson indicated they would also maintain the current <br />maintenance agreement and that it is her understanding that maintenance agreement would not require <br />revision. <br />Walsh noted Old Long Lake Road is being moved over to the east as part of the road project and the <br />people who actually live in Long Lake will now have part of their driveway in Orono but the rest of their <br />property will be in Long Lake. The issue that is before the Orono City Council is to ensure the property <br />owners are not being forced into shared driveway agreements. Walsh stated Option 4 shows that the big <br />pad in front of the driveways would be dedicated as a public road with a little bump -out that the City of <br />Long Lake would maintain it, plow the snow, and place it in their Pavement Management Plan. Orono <br />has agreed to draft an agreement to reflect that. In addition, Orono would help sign the street as a no <br />outlet as well as no parking since it is right next to a trail. <br />Page 8 <br />