My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-24-2017 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1950-2024
>
2010-2019
>
2017
>
07-24-2017 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/28/2019 4:40:58 PM
Creation date
5/28/2019 4:34:37 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
219
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, July 10, 2017 <br />7:00 o'clock p.m. <br />16. NAVARRE AREA PLAN — APPROVE SCOPE AND AUTHORIZE ADVERTISEMENT - <br />Continued <br />identification of small items that generate interest on the part of the residents as well as identification of <br />redevelopment opportunities and private investment opportunities. <br />Printup asked if he is talking about projects such as intersection landscaping. <br />Barnhart stated that could be one example. Barnhart stated the plan would help identify possible land use <br />options for different parcels. <br />Walsh commented he is not sure the City can create the demand for reinvestment. <br />Barnhart stated if the vitality of the neighborhood is a goal and there are some possible land uses <br />identified for different areas, it would give developers a better idea of what is desired in the area, but that <br />the City needs to first understand what the public would like to see. <br />Printup asked if the City can take what they have already compiled and provide it to the consultant or <br />whether that material is outdated. <br />Barnhart stated that material can be reviewed to see whether it still applies. <br />Walsh commented he would hate to spend $25,000 and then nothing happens with the plan. Walsh stated <br />the City is limited in what they can do. <br />Reeder stated the City Council may want to look at providing some type of incentives to business owners <br />to reinvest. <br />Walsh commented that can also be a slippery slope, and if there is enough demand, the owners will invest <br />in their buildings. <br />Dankey stated there should be a way to access the trail from the southern side of County Road 15. <br />Dankey noted if buildings are improved, that usually means a tenant's rent will increase, which can mean <br />those tenants will go elsewhere. <br />Crosby stated the City should be encouraging the businesses to reinvest. <br />Barnhart stated the City has not acted on a number of plans that were done in the past but that the Navarre <br />area is now starting to see more investment. Barnhart noted the City's current Comprehensive Plan is <br />eight years old and does not fit with what the residents want and that it would be better to have a plan that <br />the residents want. Barnhart stated a couple objectives of the plan would be to encourage more <br />investment and develop an overall vision for the area. <br />Walsh commented the City Council can provide specific direction to an applicant and they might choose <br />to bring forth a different plan. <br />Barnhart stated if there is a plan that the community wants, it puts the City in a stronger position to <br />provide direction to prospective developers. Barnhart noted Staff frequently hears concern from the <br />Page 12 of 14 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.