My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-24-2017 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2017
>
07-24-2017 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/28/2019 4:40:58 PM
Creation date
5/28/2019 4:34:37 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
219
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
FILE # 17-3942 <br />19 June 2017 <br />Page 4 of 5 <br />2. The variance is consistent with the comprehensive plan. The variances resulting in a <br />permit for construction of a single family residence in a residential zone are consistent <br />with the Comprehensive Plan. <br />3. The applicant establishes that there are practical difficulties. <br />a. The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not <br />permitted by the official controls; The request to permit construction of the <br />home on the foundation of the existing home within the side setback, front <br />setback, and wetland setback, appears to be reasonable as the property's <br />narrow width and depth (due to the wetland) creates a difficulty. <br />b. There are circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner; <br />The sub -standard size of the Property was not the result of actions by the <br />landowner. The location of the home and garage on the Property, the high <br />water table, the narrowness and shallow depth of the buildable area of the <br />property create difficulties for developing the Property; and <br />c. The variance will not alter the essential character of the locality. The lot area <br />and width variances will not alter the character of the neighborhood. It does <br />not appear that the setback variances to permit the new home will adversely <br />impact the adjacent property owners. <br />Additionally City Code 78-123 provides additional parameters within which a variance may be <br />granted as follows: <br />4. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Economic <br />considerations have not been a factor in the variance approval determination. <br />5. Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight <br />for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth -sheltered construction as <br />defined in Minn. Stat. § 216C.06, subd. 2, when in harmony with Orono City Code Chapter <br />78. This condition is not applicable. <br />6. The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under <br />Orono City Code Chapter 78 for property in the zone where the affected person's land is <br />located. This condition is not applicable, as the use for a residence is an allowed use in <br />the LR -1C District. <br />7. The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one -family dwelling <br />as a two-family dwelling. This condition is not applicable. <br />8. The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such <br />property or immediately adjoining property. The wetland, high water table, the <br />narrowness and shallow depth of the buildable area of the property create difficulties <br />unique to the Property. <br />9. The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which <br />the land is located. The wetland, high water table, the narrowness and shallow depth of <br />the buildable area of the property create difficulties unique to the Property. <br />10. The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a <br />substantial property right of the applicant. Staff finds this condition to be true. <br />11. The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety, comfort <br />or morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of this chapter. Granting the <br />requested variances will not adversely impact health, safety, comfort, or morals; nor <br />will it be contrary to the intent of the Code. <br />12. The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but <br />is necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty. The substandard area and width of the <br />Property; its wetland and location of the existing home and garage create practical <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.