Laserfiche WebLink
Comments: I strongly oppose this project. The impact on the already congested traffic <br />would be extremely negative. The projected size and density would have a negative <br />impact on the animals and wetlands. <br />137. Name: John Freivalds on 2017-06-06 18:00:25 <br />Comments: Strongly oppose due to negative impact on character of neighborhood and <br />dangerously increased traffic on currently congested roads. <br />138. Name: Linda Sallee on 2017-06-06 20:15:15 <br />Comments: <br />139. Name: Sonja on 2017-06-06 22:44:05 <br />Comments: <br />140. Name: Shirley Bull on 2017-06-06 23:10:24 <br />Comments: <br />141. Name: Cathy Hart on 2017-06-07 03:20:44 <br />Comments: <br />142. Name: Noah Hoffman on 2017-06-07 03:39:54 <br />Comments: <br />143. Name: Janice Hurd on 2017-06-07 05:06:25 <br />Comments: <br />144. Name: Kendall Mclntee on 2017-06-08 00:42:04 <br />Comments: <br />145. Name: M A Dahlquist on 2017-06-09 00:15:40 <br />Comments: NO!!!! This is a crazy proposal for this site for Many reasons! <br />146. Name: Larry Lundquist on 2017-06-09 13:29:38 <br />Comments: This is primarily a too tall building. <br />147. Name: Donna Lundquist on 2017-06-09 13:31:33 <br />Comments: <br />148. Name: Thomas Codute on 2017-06-10 16:07:09 <br />Comments: Way to big and too many units for such a small area. Congested area, brings <br />more congestion. I strongly oppose this project. <br />Page 14 of 18 <br />