Laserfiche WebLink
63. Name: Scott Hutton on 2017-06-02 23:21:21 <br />Comments: <br />64. Name: Barbara Miller on 2017-06-03 00:14:17 <br />Comments: <br />65. Name: Marlys Ogle on 2017-06-03 00:25:46 <br />Comments: <br />66. Name: Jan Berg on 2017-06-03 00:27:15 <br />Comments: <br />67. Name: Joe Sanguinetti on 2017-06-03 00:54:37 <br />Comments: I am strongly opposed to this development <br />68. Name: Roxanne Heaton on 2017-06-03 01:14:58 <br />Comments: <br />69. Name: Pamela Janisch on 2017-06-03 01:34:28 <br />Comments: Lake (water) quality is an important issue for Lake Minnetonka. Disturbing <br />the wetland will only be another negative impact. <br />70. Name: Diane York on 2017-06-03 02:04:44 <br />Comments: <br />71. Name: Libby Detor on 2017-06-03 02:36:14 <br />Comments: <br />72. Name: Kathy Kladek on 2017-06-03 03:13:51 <br />Comments: There is a place for everything and this is not the place to be putting in a 4-5 <br />story, 40 unit condo/apartment unit. Looks like greed to me and it is to small of an area to <br />do this. It's a wetland for nature to use! <br />73. Name: George Jones on 2017-06-03 03:22:09 <br />Comments: I live about a 2 wood away from the site of this proposed debacle. It does not <br />belong in that location. It does nothing enhance the character of downtown Orono <br />(Navarre). Traffic has already ballooned to an unsafe level in that area. Please do not <br />change any zoning or approve variances to allow this project's approval. <br />74. Name: Anita Ridge on 2017-06-03 04:17:05 <br />Comments: <br />Page 8 of 18 <br />