My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-26-2017 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2017
>
06-26-2017 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/24/2019 3:17:05 PM
Creation date
5/24/2019 3:07:08 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
314
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
CITY OF ORONO <br />RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br />NO. <br />contaminants can be effectively mitigated. <br />(11) Not create a nuisance which generates smoke, noise, glare, vibration, <br />odors, fumes, dust, electrical interference, general unsightliness, or other <br />means. The applicant has notprovided evidence that the vibration, dust, and <br />general unsightliness concerns are sufficiently mitigated <br />(12) Not cause excessive non-residential traffic on residential streets, parking <br />needs that cause a demonstrable inconvenience to adjoining properties, traffic <br />congestion, or unsafe access. The only access to the temporary use will be <br />from a single entrance to County Road 11Z There are no local streets which <br />would be impacted by traffic from the temporary use, and no local streets <br />would experience parking impacts as a result of the use. Truck traffic <br />associated with the temporary use is anticipated to be almost entirely on <br />Wayzata Boulevard which is a Hennepin County arterial road <br />(13) Designed to take into account the natural, scenic, and historic features of <br />the area and to minimize environmental impact. The use of the property is <br />independent of the natural resources. <br />(14) All exterior lighting shall be so directed so as not to cast glare toward or <br />onto the public right-of-way or neighboring residential uses or districts. The <br />applicant did not provide a lighting photometric plan to verify impact on <br />adjacentpublic rights of way, which are heavily traveled roads. <br />(15) Not detrimental to the public health, public safety, or general welfare. The <br />applicant has failed to demonstrate that the dust will not negatively impact <br />health, safety, and general wey�are. <br />9. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and <br />recommendation of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments by <br />the Applicants and the public, and the effect of the proposed interim use permit on <br />the health, safety and welfare of the community. <br />10. The City Council finds that the Applicants' request would be in keeping with the <br />spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. <br />Page 4 of 5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.