My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-26-2017 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2017
>
06-26-2017 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/24/2019 3:17:05 PM
Creation date
5/24/2019 3:07:08 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
314
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, June 12, 2017 <br />7:00 o'clock p.m. <br />22. #17-3939 JOHN BAILEY, 2807 CASCO POINT ROAD, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT — <br />Continued <br />Curtis stated they have not, but that she believes Mr. Bailey is saying that the plan has been developed <br />with an engineering mind but without the certification. <br />Bailey stated engineers have their requirements or codes that they have to live by. If the City was going <br />to build a road or a public building, then the City would need to have engineers sign off on it because <br />there is danger of someone from the public getting hurt. Bailey noted this is a residence where there have <br />been three washouts. Bailey stated this plan will put the slope back together as good or better than it was <br />and that he is trying to improve or correct what nature did. Bailey stated he is not refuting engineering <br />principles. <br />Walsh stated there is a steep grade there and that there needs to be a solution arrived at. Walsh stated he <br />does not want to impose a quarter million dollar solution and that the property owner does not want to see <br />further washouts but that the City Council and engineers have to follow certain rules. <br />Dankey noted there are other similar situations on the lake. <br />Walsh commented he does not want to see the situation become worse and that the soil borings show <br />there are pretty stable soils. <br />Seals stated the Filtrex system does look like great bank stabilization but that she is not sure how that will <br />work in conjunction with the pipe underneath and how the size of the pipe was determined. Seals noted <br />Filtrex calls for a 2:1 slope and asked what the applicant is proposing. Seals commented she wants to <br />protect the property owner from having further damage without having to cut the whole yard back. <br />Ron Anderson, Final Grade, noted they have done a number of projects on Lake Minnetonka, such as the <br />Wayzata Muni, and that they are attempting to come up with a landscape solution to help address the <br />problem. Anderson stated they will have to export the dirt since the soils are extremely saturated and get <br />down to a firm base. Anderson indicated they will place some solid clay in there, which will be <br />compacted in, and that the Filtrex will help to stabilize the slope rapidly. The Filtrex will not change or <br />become the structure of the slope. <br />Seals asked how the Filtrex will work with the pipes. <br />Anderson indicated the pipes will go below the Filtrex. Anderson stated the big reason the slope failed in <br />those two areas is the drainage split and the water came down continuously resulting in the slope failure. <br />Anderson stated the pipes will take the drainage away from that slope. <br />Crosby asked how many culverts there will be. <br />Anderson indicated there will be two. <br />Seals asked what slope they are recommending. <br />Anderson stated the existing slope is less than 1: 1 and that they will keep it to just under a 1: 1. Anderson <br />stated matching the property comers at the neighbors will be a challenge since they are steeper than this <br />Page 10 of 19 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.