Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, May 22, 2017 <br />7:00 o'clock p.m. <br />Walsh stated if it is a windy day, there likely will be dust blowing all over the place. <br />Engleman commented the dust was blowing on the cars and that Eureka had to put up tarps to prevent it <br />from blowing over onto the John Deere property. <br />Dankey and Crosby both agreed that that is more reason to get it off the road where it has the least impact <br />on everybody. <br />Printup asked if there is another larger area in Orono that is further remote. Printup asked whether the <br />contractor could use Baker Park Preserve, which is located in Hennepin County and ftirther removed from <br />everybody. <br />Walsh commented Hennepin County does not want contamination at the park. <br />Dankey stated there are also a number of homes near the park. <br />Printup stated he does not want it to be Orono's problem and that there are other solutions that could be <br />explored. <br />Dankey noted it will be in front of everyone at some point as well as near the school and the soccer fields <br />if it continues down Highway 12. <br />Gaffron noted Baker Park is owned by Three Rivers Park District and that it is unlikely they would allow <br />it on their site. Gaffron stated to his knowledge there is not another site close by in Orono except the site <br />where the Public Works Department recycles some material. Gaffron stated if it is moved to that site, the <br />residents in that area would likely complain. Gaffron indicated there might be large pieces of property in <br />Medina. <br />Crosby asked how close this property is to the apple orchard. <br />Gaffron indicated it is probably 500 to 700 feet to the nearest house and a 1000 feet from the orchard <br />compared to 50 feet in front of Otten Brothers. <br />Dankey noted the trees between the housing development project and the Dumas Orchard are getting all <br />the dust and everything from that project. Dankey stated she has more concerns with the dust from that <br />development impacting the apple orchard than from this site. <br />The City Council reviewed an aerial map of the area. Gaffron pointed out the residences near this site. <br />Dankey stated in her view the property is not that close to other homes. <br />Printup stated it is Hennepin County's project and that it can stay on their road. Printup commented it <br />does not need to be in Orono. <br />Crosby noted it will be in Orono sooner or later and that the City can place different restrictions on the <br />activity if it is on this site. <br />Page 6 of 9 <br />