My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-12-2017 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2017
>
06-12-2017 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/24/2019 3:05:12 PM
Creation date
5/24/2019 2:54:51 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
351
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
CITY OF ORONO <br />RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br />NO. <br />narrow and the encroachment to the street setback is reasonable considering the <br />20 foot setback from the traveled roadway. The Owner's desire to keep the total <br />height of the sign low to the ground necessitates the reduction in the separation of <br />the sign copy area from grade. The required landscaping can still be <br />accommodated in the proposed 16 -inch separation. <br />b. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to his property not created <br />by the landowner. <br />The property owner purchased the marina after it had been developed and the site <br />layout is existing. The property owner did not create the circumstances. <br />c. The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. " <br />The requested variances will not alter the character of the neighborhood. The lake <br />setback and hardcover variances are reasonable and necessary as the most <br />logical location for the entry signage is near the rear and within the 75 -foot setback <br />of the lake. The low profile of the sign will allow for limited visual obstruction and <br />will require the sign copy area to be lower to the ground than the required 20 <br />inches. The landscaping area surrounding the proposed sign will comply with the <br />Code. <br />4. "Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties." Economic <br />considerations have not been a factor in the variance approval determination. <br />5. "Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight <br />for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth -sheltered construction as <br />defined in Minn. Stat. § 216C.06, subd. 2, when in harmony with Orono City Code Chapter <br />78." This condition is not applicable. <br />6. "The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under <br />Orono City Code Chapter 78 for property in the zone where the affected person's land is <br />located." This condition is not applicable, as the use for signage is an allowed use in the <br />B-2 District <br />7. "The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one -family dwelling <br />as a two-family dwelling." This condition is not applicable. <br />8. "The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such <br />property or immediately adjoining property." The location and nature of the Property <br />necessitate the proximity to the lake. The need for identification, parking, and vehicle <br />maneuvering on the Property creates increased difficulties which drive the sign location <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.