My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-12-2017 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2017
>
06-12-2017 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/24/2019 3:05:12 PM
Creation date
5/24/2019 2:54:51 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
351
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Council <br />CITY OF ORONO Exhibit C <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING 17-3925 <br />Monday, May 15,2017 <br />6:30 o'clock p.m. <br />2. 17-3925 City of Orono, Text Amendment: Small Lots/Setbacks, 6:35 P.M. — 7:03 P.M. <br />Barnhart noted the Planning Commission reviewed this item at their April meeting where it was tabled. <br />The issue of setbacks for small lots within the City has been on the ordinance review list for several years. <br />In the Council's goals for 2017, it ranked as the 5th most important issue. <br />In 2016, the City processed 41 variances of various types; side or street setbacks were included in 19 of <br />them. This is as a result of a number of properties having been developed prior to the enactment of the <br />regulations and requires the property owner to request a variance of some type. At the time the original <br />ordinances were created, property owners were encouraged to combine smaller lots into one bigger lot, <br />which did not occur as often as the City would have liked. <br />There are several areas of the community where the development pattem is inconsistent with the zoning <br />district. Map A shows lots in red that are less than 1/4 acre, with clusters of these lots being located in <br />1/2 acre, I acre, and 2 acre zones. <br />As an example, the LR- I B district has a minimum one acre lot size. A number of lots are a quarter acre <br />or half an acre. The front yard setback is 3 5 feet, the side yard setback is 10 feet, and the back yard <br />setback is 35 feet. A majority of the lots do not meet those setbacks and are nonconforming. In the <br />nonconforming situation, any property owner who would like to expand would require a variance, which <br />tends to be a 6 -week process. The question before the Planning Commission and the City Council is <br />whether this process should be modified in some manner to allow these properties to be improved without <br />the need for so many variances. In the case of a variance, the property owner needs to demonstrate a <br />practical difficulty. <br />Map B shows lots in blue between 1/4 and 1/2 acre, with clusters of these lots being located in 1/2 <br />acre, I acre, and 2 acre zones. Each map includes the zoning legend. Approximately 95% of the non- <br />conforming lots are within one of these four zoning districts. <br />Barnhart noted Staff s report identifies four different options. One option is to leave everything as is and <br />retain the variance process. <br />Page 1 of 6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.