My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-12-2017 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2017
>
06-12-2017 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/24/2019 3:05:12 PM
Creation date
5/24/2019 2:54:51 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
351
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
CITY OF ORONO <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />Monday, May 15,2017 <br />6:30 o'clock p.m. <br />Schoenzeit commented he is the last one to say that the City should make someone spend money, but this <br />particular activity is at an intensity level that requires engineering. Schoenzeit stated he cannot make a <br />recommendation for them to go forward with it since it is against Staff s recommendations. <br />Leskinen stated if they can find an engineer that will sign off on the plans as proposed, then that is one <br />thing, but that she is not comfortable with it. <br />Olson stated he is struggling with it since the property owner did not cause this problem. Olson stated he <br />does not doubt the capability of the team but questioned whether the City is setting up a level of <br />expectation that other applicants will also not require engineering. <br />Schwingler noted it would be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. <br />Thiesse questioned whether the future owner also has an expectation that it will hold. <br />Schoenzeit stated the liability probably comes with a future property owner. <br />Curtis noted conditional use permits are recorded against the title of the property so they would be <br />accessible to a future owner. <br />Thiesse stated in his mind it is more than a landscaping project and is remediation. <br />Schwingler stated he is okay with it without the engineer signoff. Schwingler commented it is a tough <br />case and that the property owners are trying to do the right thing. Schwingler stated he understands the <br />importance of an engineer signoff, but instead of allowing the property owners to improve what exists, the <br />City is now penalizing them and requiring them to get an engineer approval. Schwingler commented <br />sometimes it comes down to a practicality. <br />Schoenzeit commented he knows enough about engineering that he cannot say yes to this. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.