My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-12-2017 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2017
>
06-12-2017 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/24/2019 3:05:12 PM
Creation date
5/24/2019 2:54:51 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
351
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
CITY OF ORONO <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />Monday, May 15,2017 <br />6:30 o'clock p.m. <br />Thiesse stated the unfortunate part is that the Baileys have had several engineers out to the property and <br />they have all proposed things that they do not want to do. Thiesse stated it may hold up but then again it <br />might not. <br />Leskinen asked how it would impact the City if it doesn't. <br />Thiesse commented if it fails, the slope would be back in the lake. <br />John Baily noted this is a residence and a lakeshore. Bailey pointed out there are still portions of the <br />lakeshore that remain so they know it will hold. Bailey stated he wants to restore what washed out and <br />that what they are proposing will make it as good or better than what held. Bailey stated this is a practical <br />solution and it does not require an engineered solution like a road. Bailey reiterated it will be better than <br />the adjoining ground and that it is not rocket science. Bailey stated if they look at it from a practical <br />standpoint, they can see how this can be repaired rather than cutting everything back to make sure it <br />meets engineering requirements. <br />Thiesse noted they just required an engineering solution of a family on the north side of Long Lake. <br />Schoenzeit stated as far as the Planning Commission is concerned, they cannot recommend a non- <br />traditional solution. <br />Thiesse commented the Planning Commission can certainly recommend to the City Council that they <br />allow it, but that he is not ready to do that. <br />Schoenzeit stated the applicant can plead his case to the City Council. <br />Thiesse asked if the fact that it will be as good or better than the adjoining land is an acceptable reason to <br />allow it. <br />Schwingler stated it is an acceptable answer to him. <br />Leskinen asked if an engineer can sign off on a well thought out landscape plan. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.