My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-22-2017 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2017
>
05-22-2017 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/24/2019 2:54:40 PM
Creation date
5/24/2019 2:45:09 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
279
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, May 8,2017 <br />7:00 o'clock p.m. <br />16. #17-3922 CITY OF ORONO, TEXT AMENDMENT: WETLANDS REGULATIONS — <br />ORDINANCE NO. 196, Third Series. — continued <br />Walsh stated that number was for discussion at the Planning Commission but is not contained within the <br />proposed ordinance. <br />Jones encouraged the City Council to look at this issue carefully and to consider some of the unintended <br />consequences that might arise if the setbacks are changed. Jones stated the variance process would allow <br />the City to make case-by-case decisions rather than having a broad, sweeping change of the ordinance. <br />Walsh stated he is glad to see all the participation by the residents on this issue. Walsh noted the variance <br />process is not a give and take and it requires the property owner to prove a hardship. <br />Jamie Lowe, 105 Orono Orchard Road, stated he agrees with the previous speaker's comments and that it <br />seems like this is being fast forwarded somewhat since it is early in the year and this was listed as five or <br />six on the Council's priority list. <br />Walsh stated the Council has probably gone through I through 10 already and that they are working their <br />way through the top 20 prioritized items. Overall the Council identified 60 total priorities. Walsh stated <br />the City is conducting a review of their ordinances to see what is relevant and what is not. Walsh <br />indicated this issue was brought up because there was a desire to revisit the delineation issue and setbacks <br />since it was causing some delays and other issues. Walsh stated the discussion allows ideas to come <br />about on how to deal with things. <br />Lowe asked how people were selected for the Code Review Committee. <br />Walsh indicated it is composed of people who expressed an interest in it and that the City will take <br />anyone who expressed an interest in being on the committee. <br />Lowe asked if there is a requirement to reside in the City to serve on a committee. <br />Walsh stated he is not aware of any hard and fast rule to that effect and to his knowledge the members on <br />the committee reside in Orono. Walsh stated there are some people on the Big Island committee that are <br />not Orono residents since it is more of a regional asset. <br />Lowe stated the vigorous, onerous processes that are in place are things that the residents have lived and <br />abided by and help to make Orono a special city. Lowe commented he does not want to be governed by a <br />body that does not have a direct interest in the City and that he would challenge the Council to leave the <br />regulations as is. <br />Printup stated he has heard a number of rumors as well and that he heard tonight that this change could <br />result in higher density, which he is not in favor of. Printup stated in his view debating a 10 -foot wetland <br />buffer will not impact density. <br />Lowe stated he had heard that some members of that committee were not Orono residents and that in his <br />view it would not be fair to have outside residents dictating Orono policy. <br />Dankey commented that is not the case. <br />Page 28 of 34 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.