My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-22-2017 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2017
>
05-22-2017 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/24/2019 2:54:40 PM
Creation date
5/24/2019 2:45:09 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
279
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, May 8,2017 <br />7:00 o'clock p.m. <br />15. # 17-3941 LAKE WEST DEVELOPMENT, LLC, O/B/O RICK AND BARBARA <br />LUPIENT, 3580 IVY PLACE, SKETCH PLAN REVIEW — Continued <br />Fretharn stated they will address that neighbor's concerns and that the situation should be improved as <br />part of this project. Fretham indicated he has also met with the neighbor regarding the view easement and <br />that they believe by getting further along in this process it will make those discussions easier. <br />Crosby asked if there is only one neighbor that has an issue with the view. <br />Gaffron indicated there is one lot that has a view easement. <br />Gaffron noted the Planning Commission also discussed restricting construction parking and storage of <br />materials to the site only. <br />Fretham stated the property consists of over two acres and that they will be able to accommodate the <br />construction parking and material storage. <br />The City Council took no formal action on this item. <br />(Recess taken from 9:12 p.m. to 9:19 p.m.) <br />16. #17-3922 CITY OF ORONO, TEXT AMENDMENT: WETLANDS REGULATIONS — <br />ORDINANCE NO. 196, Third Series. <br />Barnhart stated before the City Council tonight is a proposed text amendment related to wetland <br />regulations. Wetland regulations, and primarily the setbacks related to wetlands, ranked number six on <br />the Council's priorities set last fall. The Development Process Review Comniittee also recommended <br />that the wetland regulations be reviewed to be more consistent with the Minnehaha Creek Watershed <br />District. <br />There are two primary areas where the City ordinances differ from the Watershed District rules. Those <br />areas are buffer setbacks and when wetland delineations are required. Barnhart noted there is a difference <br />between a buffer and a setback. <br />A wetland buffer is established by the Watershed District as a "No -Touch" area when the Watershed <br />District requires a delineation. No activity may occur in the buffer. This buffer distance ranges from 12.5 <br />to 75 feet depending on the type of wetland. The Watershed allows buffer averaging, which is an increase <br />of the buffer depth in one area of the lot to reduce it in another area. <br />A wetland setback is established by the City. No structure may be built within the setback but other <br />activity may occur in that area. Orono's setbacks vary between 35 feet and 85 feet. Currently, city code <br />requires a 3 5 -foot setback minimum and is often used when no buffer has been established by the <br />Watershed District. <br />Barnhart stated in situations where there is a wetland but a buffer has not been required, the City requires <br />a 35 -foot setback or whatever the wetland buffer would be. <br />Walsh asked why the Watershed District would say no wetland buffer is necessary. <br />Page 20 of 34 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.