My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-08-2017 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2017
>
05-08-2017 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/24/2019 2:42:35 PM
Creation date
5/24/2019 2:27:18 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
488
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />Monday, March 20,2017 <br />6:30 o'clock p.m. <br />Landgraver asked if a date certain could be set for the interim use, and then if that date is not met, the date <br />could be extended. <br />Gaffron stated that is one option. Another option is that the interim use could be required to be renewed <br />on an annual basis. Gaff-ron stated one of the questions is what are the potential future uses or ancillary <br />uses of the site that might not have been predicted or expected. Gaffron stated it could also be a trigger <br />event rather than a trigger date. <br />Gaffron asked if the Planning Commission would like to review Item No. 6 in conjunction with this <br />application or separately. <br />Lemke stated he would like more time to review this item since there are three options from three <br />different cities they need to review. <br />Thiesse commented this weekend was the first time be has seen this request and that he would <br />recommend Staff prepare draft language for an ordinance so the Planning Commission and the public has <br />something firm to review. <br />Gaff-ron stated Staff did not prepare language because they were not sure whether the Planning <br />Commission would be interested in an interim use ordinance. Gaffron indicated it would not take very <br />long for Staff to draft language. <br />Thiesse asked if another public hearing would then be required, <br />Gaffron stated the Planning Commission has the option to hold a second public hearing or tabling the <br />application at this meeting for further review. <br />Landgraver asked if there is another work session scheduled for April. <br />Barnhart indicated it would be April 5. <br />Page 12 of 64 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.