My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-08-2017 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2017
>
05-08-2017 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/24/2019 2:42:35 PM
Creation date
5/24/2019 2:27:18 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
488
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMDUSSION MEETING <br />Monday, April 17,2017 <br />6:30 o'clock p.m. <br />Gaffron stated the City Attorney has advised that the city cannot issue a permit since it is state land <br />that Orono does not have permitting authority over state land. Gaffron indicated the City can enforce <br />certain performance standards on the operation such as times of operation, but that it is difficult to <br />regulate the operatio since it will occur on state land. <br />Engleman stated in his view there are things that can be done but they cannot be done immediately. <br />Gaff-ron stated he understands ?Mr. Engleman had a conversation with the City Administrator today who <br />has told him basically the same thing. <br />Engleman asked how the state can move in if it is zoned 2 -acre residential. <br />Gaffron stated the state trumps city zoning. <br />Engleman stated in regards to the letter from the Dumases, they will have a bigger problem now than with <br />Lake West since the equipment will be closer to them. <br />Thiesse stated unfortunately the City's hands are tied. <br />Chair Thiesse closed the public hearing at 7:43 p.m. <br />Leskinen stated in concept an interim use permit can be a tool for the City. Leskinen noted when the <br />Planning Commission discussed this a long time ago and to her recollection there were some cautionary <br />tales. Leskinen stated the City would have to be very diligent about it and that she is concerned there are <br />uses that can either be inappropriate and hard to get rid of or may do irreparable damage to the site. <br />Leskinen indicated she is open to the idea but that she does have some reservations. <br />Landgraver indicated he is in favor of it since it is another tool in the City's toolbox. Currently the only <br />tool the City has is a conditional use permit, which goes with the land and is permanent, and the interim <br />use permit only goes for a certain time period. Landgraver stated it would force the City to be disciplined <br />and make sure all the T's are crossed. <br />Page 17 of 72 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.