My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-08-2017 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2017
>
05-08-2017 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/24/2019 2:42:35 PM
Creation date
5/24/2019 2:27:18 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
488
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINIJTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />Monday, April 17,2017 <br />6:30 o'clock p.m. <br />"nonconforming use conditional use permit" in the 1960s. Later conditional use permits were <br />for minor expansion of the market use. When the market closed, the building eventually became a <br />daycare center via a new conditional use permit. When MnDOT determined that the property would be <br />needed for the Highway 12 bypass, the daycare use discontinued but it was a number of years before that <br />part of the bypass was constructed. As a result, the building sat empty for a number of years. Because <br />the City had no interim use ordinance, any temporary use of the site was not allowed. <br />Potential disadvantages of an interim use permit include property owners proposing land uses that are <br />inappropriate for a given site or disruptive to the neighboring property owners or would be inconsistent <br />with the character of the surrounding area. If the Council approves an amendment to the Zoning Code to <br />allow interim uses, the City, developers and the property owners will have to be very clear about the <br />parameters for such use. Clear and concise documentation of the allowed land use, activities and time <br />periods will be required with each lUP issued. The City must be diligent not only in establishing <br />appropriate interim uses within specified zoning districts but in monitoring those uses for compliance <br />with the established terms of each issued 1UP. <br />Before the Planning Commission tonight is a draft ordinance. This is drafted similar to the general code <br />section on conditional uses. It contains language that mimics the state statute on interim uses and also <br />contains certain provisions that should pertain to all interim use permits. Sample ordinances from other <br />cities are also attached. Gaffron stated while the ordinances differ widely, there are four common <br />elements: A definition purpose and intent; application procedures; standards and conditions; and a <br />termination clause. <br />Gaffron noted the companion application to the text amendment includes a request for an interim use <br />permit in the RR- I B, Single Family Rural Residential Zoning District. The applicant is proposing <br />temporary use of the property at 3245 Wayzata Boulevard fo staging of construction activities associated <br />with the County Road 112 improvement project. <br />The Planning Commission should review the provided information and discuss the advantages and <br />disadvantages of having an interim use option in the zoning code and review the draft text amendments. <br />The Planning Commission should also identify any specific concerns about the proposed construction <br />staging/materials recycling use and suggest any additional conditions that might be applicable. <br />Page 15 of 72 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.