Laserfiche WebLink
FILE #17-3918 <br />17 April 2017 <br />Page 5 of 9 <br />Additionally City Code 78-123 provides additional parameters within which a variance may be <br />granted as follows: <br />4. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Economic <br />considerations have not been a factor in the variance approval determination. <br />5. Practical difficulties also include butare not limitedto inadequate access to direct sunlight <br />for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth -sheltered construction as <br />defined in Minn. Stat. § 216C.06, subd. 2, when in harmony with Orono City Code Chapter <br />78. This condition is not applicable. <br />6. The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under <br />Orono City Code Chapter 78 for property in the zone where the affected person's land is <br />located. This condition is not applicable, as the use for a residence is an allowed use in <br />the LR -1A District. <br />7. The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one -family dwelling <br />as a two-family dwelling. This condition is not applicable. <br />8. The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such <br />property or immediately adjoining property. The substandard lot width of the Property <br />is not uncommon in the surrounding neighborhood. The presence of the 1% annual <br />chance floodplain on the property creates increased difficulties which drive the building <br />pad location and improvements toward the lake. <br />9. The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which <br />the land is located. The property to the east has a higher grade than the subject <br />property. The two properties to the west have similar floodplain challenges. <br />10. The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a <br />substantial property right of the applicant. Granting the requested variances will provide <br />relief to the applicant regarding the lot size and floodplain on the property. <br />11. The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety, comfort <br />or morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of this chapter. Granting the <br />requested variances will not adversely impact health, safety, comfort, or morals; nor <br />will it be contrary to the intent of the Code. <br />12. The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but <br />is necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty. The size of the Property; the <br />flood pl a i n/topogra phy create practical difficulties affecting the Property; the variances <br />are necessary and not merely serve as a convenience to the owners. <br />The Commission may recommend or Council may impose conditions in granting of variances. <br />Any conditions imposed must be directly related to and must bear a rough proportionality to the <br />impact created by the variance. No variance shall be granted or changed beyond the use <br />permitted in this chapter in the district where such land is located. <br />Applicable Regulation: Conditional Use Permit (Section 78-916) <br />The Planning Commission may recommend and the Council may grant a Conditional Use <br />Permit (CUP) as the use permit was applied for or in modified form. On the basis of the <br />application and the evidence submitted, the city must find that the proposed use at the <br />proposed location is or will be: <br />1) Consistent with the community management plan; The bathroom within an accessory <br />building and the proposed grading to elevate the home and portions of the property <br />above the 1% annual chance floodplain is residential in nature, are both consistent <br />