Laserfiche WebLink
AGENDAITEM <br />Item No.: <br />Date: April 10, 2017 <br />Item Description: #17-3912, Bruce Birkeland, 1298 Wildhurst Trail & Lot 3, Block, <br />Wildhurst, Variances <br />Presenter: Melanie Curtis Agenda Planning Department Report <br />Planner Section: <br />1. Purpose. This application is regarding variances to facilitate a lot line adjustment to create a second <br />lakeshore lot. <br />2. MN§15.99 Application Deadline. The application was received on February 21, 2017; it was <br />considered as complete on February 23'. Therefore the 60 -Day review period expires on April 24, <br />2017. <br />3. Background. The applicant owns three lots on Wildhurst Trail. Two of the lots are the subject of <br />this application: Lot 2, Block 1, Wildhurst (addressed 1298 Wildhurst Trail), and Lot 3, Block 1, <br />Wildhurst (unaddressed). Currently Lot 2 is a lakeshore lot and Lot 3 is not. <br />An application for a subdivision exemption was submitted to permit an administrative lot line <br />rearrangement (also known as a boundary line adjustment) between the two properties in order to <br />reconfigure (create) Lot 3 as a lakeshore lot. Based on the information provided, there is not <br />sufficient width at the ordinary high water level and at the 75 -foot setback as required by the Code <br />to support the new lake lot. Further, the existing home reduces options, almost certainly requiring <br />a side yard setback variance. New non -conformities are created, variances are necessary to process <br />the boundary line adjustment. <br />4. Planning Commission Comment. On March 20, 2017, the Planning Commission held a public <br />hearing and reviewed the application. The Planning Commission felt the request was "reasonable", <br />however they struggled with the lack of practical difficulty as needed to support the variance. <br />Following the public hearing the Commission voted 5 to 0 on a motion to recommend denial. The <br />Commission further recommended the applicant provide additional practical difficulties analysis <br />to support their request prior to consideration by the City Council. <br />5. Public Comment. Comments from the public were received regarding this application and were <br />included as an exhibit to the Planning Commission report. Additional comments were made at the <br />meeting; please refer to the Planning Commission minutes attached as Exhibit D. <br />6. Staff Recommendation. Staff has received a revised practical difficulty form from the applicant. <br />Staff does not feel they adequately support the variances requested. The Council could refer the <br />application back to the Commission, or make a decision based on this new information. <br />The lots are currently conforming. Therefore, Staff recommends denial of variances for lot width <br />to create the new lakeshore lot. If the applicant is able to show both lots can meet the required 140 - <br />foot standard at the OHWL and at the 75 -foot setback, staff would support a side setback variance <br />for the existing home. <br />COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED <br />Direct Staff to draft a resolution regarding Council's decision for consideration at the April 24 th meeting. <br />Prepared By: MOO Reviewed By: J. Bamhart Approved By: <br />