My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-24-2017 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2017
>
04-24-2017 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/24/2019 2:23:26 PM
Creation date
5/24/2019 2:19:11 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
171
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
CITY OF ORONO <br />RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br />NO. <br />FINDINGS OF FACT: <br />1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #17-3912. The analysis contained within <br />staff memos and the exhibits attached to the aforesaid memos, all minutes from the above <br />mentioned meetings, and any and all other materials distributed at these meetings are <br />hereby incorporated by reference. <br />2. The Properties are located in the LR -1 B Single Family Lakeshore Residential Zoning <br />District. <br />3. Parcel A will have 1.01 dry acres in area and a defined lot widths of 144 feet at the OHWL <br />and 130 feet at the 75 foot setback. <br />4. Parcel B will have 1.28 dry acres in area and a defined lot widths of 186 feet at the OHWIL <br />and 125 feet at the 75 foot setback. <br />5. The Property is within Tier 1 and hardcover for Parcel A and Parcel B is limited to 25% <br />each according to the Stormwater Quality Overlay District. <br />6. Applicant has applied for the following variance[s]: <br />a. Lot Width Variances for both parcels. <br />7. In considering this application for variances, the Council has considered the advice and <br />recommendation of the Planning Commission and the effect of the proposed variance <br />upon the health, safety and welfare of the community, existing and anticipated traffic <br />conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, and the effect on values <br />of property in the surrounding area. <br />ANALYSIS: <br />1 . "Variances shall only be permitted when they are in harmony with the general purposes <br />and intent of the ordinance . . . ." Two lots exist currently. The density is not proposed to <br />increase. The size of the proposed parcels are consistent with the other properties in the <br />neighborhood and comply with the City Code. The lot width variance would also be in <br />harmony with the Ordinance. <br />2. "Variances shall only be permitted . . . when the variances are consistent with the <br />comprehensive plan." The requested variances allow the development and <br />redevelopment of each of the single family lots. Single family lots with a residential use is <br />consistent with the comprehensive plan. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.