My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-10-2017 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2017
>
04-10-2017 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/24/2019 2:13:33 PM
Creation date
5/24/2019 2:02:56 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
384
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />Monday, March 20,2017 <br />6:30 o'clock p.m. <br />Besseson stated the way the property sits now makes it difficult to build anything facing Wildhurst and County Road <br />19. Besseson commented they would rather see a $2 million house built there rather than a $200,000 house. <br />Besseson indicated he did talk to Staff about resolving this and that the plan does currently meet the required criteria <br />except the house happens to be sitting within the 1 0 -foot setback. <br />Besseson stated they can tear the house down but that they would rather not do that and that they are attempting to <br />come up with an alternative to make it work. Besseson stated they cannot go forward until they get some direction on <br />this. <br />Neil Weber, Architect, stated when they started out with this project, they felt they had enough lineal feet of <br />shoreland. Weber stated they interpreted it as the actual footage instead of a straight line but that they would still have <br />enough lineal footage. Weber stated the only reasonable place to construct a house to meet the criteria would be in <br />this upper area, which is not the best use of the lot. Weber stated they were basically attempting to place the house in <br />a more ideal location so there would be a view of the lake. <br />Weber stated they then went to Mark Gronberg and he indicated they need 140 feet at the shore and at the setback <br />line. Weber stated they had an option of the 140 feet in both areas with the need for a side setback variance or an <br />option where it met the 10 -foot side setback but does not have the required width. <br />Weber stated as far as they are concerned, either option works. <br />Weber noted this area is not a bluff and that Staff agrees with their interpretation. Weber stated without changing the <br />topography, the house will need to be located significantly behind the setback due to the grade, and no matter how the <br />line is configured, the house will need to be further back. Weber stated to his understanding somebody from the City <br />came and verified that the proposed access onto the road was acceptable. Weber noted they probably would not be <br />able to have access onto County Road 19. <br />Weber stated the bottom line is, no matter how the lines end up being configured, they will end up with the same site <br />plan. Weber stated they felt the 140 feet at the building line was the logical interpretation, which is what their plan is <br />based on. Weber stated no matter how it ends up, the proposed location for the house is the logical site. Weber stated <br />they are not creating a new lot but that they are trying to rearrange the lines so they can get the best use of the site and <br />take advantage of the view. <br />Chair Thiesse closed the public hearing at 8:25 p.m. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.