My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-10-2017 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2017
>
04-10-2017 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/24/2019 2:13:33 PM
Creation date
5/24/2019 2:02:56 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
384
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />Monday, March 20,2017 <br />6:30 o'clock p.m. <br />It is unknown whether or not two lakeshore lots can be created that meet the dimensional standards of the LR- I B <br />requirements if the existing home is removed. <br />The preferred option of Staff would be to create two conforming lots. The existing home is likely a temporary <br />situation, suggested by common redevelopment of homes of this age when the properties are sold. There is a <br />sufficient buildable area on the property to accommodate a new home in a conforming location. <br />After further analysis, it appears that neither lot in Option I meets the 140 -foot requirement at the lake or at the 75 - <br />foot setback. There could potentially be an option that meets the requirements but Staff does not have that <br />information at this time. If the applicant wishes to create a new lakeshore lot, Staff suggests the applicant show that <br />both lots will meet the 140 -foot requirement in both locations. <br />Comments from the neighbors have been received and are before the Planning Commission this evening. A comment <br />from the applicant's engineer was also received and should be read into the record. <br />Planning Staff recommends denial of lot width variances facilitating an adjustment of the property line. If the <br />Planning Commission can support the variance from the lot width LR- I B standards, Staff prefers Option I regarding <br />the site setback variance for the existing home. The applicant is encouraged to explore alternatives which result in <br />two lots with conforming area and width prior to placement on the City Council agenda. <br />Thiesse requested City Planner Curtis read the letter from Mark Gronberg into the record. <br />Curtis read the following letter into the record: <br />9� <br />"Bruce, I was very surprised to see the City of Orono interpretation that the lot width at the 75 -foot lakeshore setback <br />should be measured at the inside of the chord rather than the outside of the chord as we have shown on our survey <br />drawing. <br />We have been showing it this way for many years on other projects in Orono and in other adjoining cities as well and <br />have never been questioned on our interpretation. The purpose of a lot width measurement is to show that you have <br />enough room to build a house on the lot. You would certainly not be allowed to build the house at the inside chord <br />line because you would be way too close to the lake. Taking the measurement at the outside of the chord gives a more <br />correct representation of where you can build." <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.