Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday March 13,2017 <br />7:00 o'clock p.m. <br />14. #17-3896 CITY OF ORONO TEXT AMENDMENT: STRUCTURAL COVERAGE — <br />ORDINANCE No. 187 — Continued - <br />Seals stated if the goal is to be more flexible, Option B would accomplish that and would eliminate a <br />number of variance requests that the City heard last year. <br />There were no public comments received. <br />Crosby stated the Council has to be concerned about the hardcover issue. Crosby stated when someone <br />drives along the lakeshore, you can tell the difference between Orono and the other communities. <br />Walsh noted the hardcover will not be changed under this ordinance. <br />Seals moved, Printup seconded, to approve Option B, with the structural coverage limit being <br />raised from 15 percent to 20 percent, and to adopt ORDINANCE NO. 187, a Third Series, an <br />Ordinance Amending the Code of Ordinances Pertaining to Removing Structural Coverage <br />Restrictions and Adding Hardcover Limitations to Certain Lots Within the City of Orono. <br />Barnhart noted for lots less than 10,000 square feet, they currently are allowed 1,500 square feet, and to <br />be consistent it should be raised to 2,000 square feet. <br />VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. <br />15. #17-3897 CITY OF ORONO TEXT AMENDMENT: SPECIAL EVENTS —ORDINANCE <br />- Tabled <br />Barnhart stated the intent of the last ordinance is to close a loophole in the City's ordinance relating to <br />special events. Last summer/fall Staff learned of an issue in a neighborhood where a property owner held <br />a series of private events in their private home. These events did not require a permit due to the patrons <br />being bused in. There was no on -street parking, no trash generated, and no loud noise so it did not fall <br />within the City's special event requirements. The City eventually reviewed it as a home occupation and <br />denied it. <br />The events occurred on Friday, Saturday, and Sunday on several weekends over the summer. At that time <br />a large bus would drive through the neighborhood and deliver the patrons to the house. The neighbors <br />felt uncomfortable with that. <br />Barnhart stated the draft ordinance is intended to define occasional private parties. The current ordinance <br />exempts private parties from special event permits. The draft ordinance adjusts the definitions of private <br />and special events and attempts to differentiate between an occasional private party and one that is more <br />impactful to neighborhoods. <br />Barnhart stated Staff s discussion centered around the frequency of the events and what the true impact <br />was of the events. Traffic was not really an issue given the large bus delivering the patrons so it came <br />down to the frequency. The draft ordinance would allow a property to have three private events a year <br />without a permit from the City. The fourth event would require the issuance of a permit. Barnhart stated <br />Page 2S of 32 <br />