My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-13-2017 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2017
>
03-13-2017 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/24/2019 1:45:07 PM
Creation date
5/24/2019 1:21:35 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
563
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION <br />Tuesday, February 21, 2017 <br />6:30 o'clock p.m. <br />In regards to the average setback, the home is situated on a peninsula. The property located at 2165 North <br />Shore Drive across the bay is the adjacent property and determines the average lakeshore setback. The <br />home at 2165 North Shore is located approximately 170 feet from the ordinary high water level. <br />According to City Code, the guest cabin must be located equal to or further back from the lake than the <br />home located at 2165 North Shore Drive. <br />The proposed cabin meets the 75 -foot setback from the lake. The northern stoop access to the cabin is <br />within the setback at 67 feet. An additional 61 square feet of hardcover is proposed within the 75 -foot <br />setback. The applicant is attempting to avoid impacting the existing extensive garden features on the <br />property with the new cabin construction. <br />Staff finds that the peninsula configuration of the property functions much like an island yet shares a 6 - <br />foot connection with the property across the bay at 2165 North Shore Drive dictating the average <br />lakeshore setback requirement. The subject property does not block views of the lake froin the home at <br />2165 North Shore Drive as it is across the water from the home. Staff finds the practical difficulty <br />requirements are satisfied regarding the average lakesbore setback. <br />The applicant has opted to modify the footprint and location of the guest cabin thereby triggering the need <br />for the variances as well as the conditional use permit. Staff finds that the stoop on the north side of the <br />home can be removed as there are three other points of egress. The proposed development suggests <br />hardcover levels beneath the Tier I allowance and there is sufficient pervious area offering infiltration <br />opportunities on the property. <br />The conditions applying to the two different conditional use permits relating to the guest cabin have been <br />satisfied according to Staff. The engineering standards required as part of the floodplain regulations <br />apply to the conditional use permit for the structure and will be reviewed and applied at the permit stage. <br />Planning Staff recommends approval of the variances and conditional use permits as follows: <br />I . Approval of the guest house conditional use permit with the standard covenants; <br />2. Approval of the conditional use permit to permit the guest house to be constructed on helical piers <br />within the floodplain; and <br />Approval of the average setback variance for the construction of the new guest house cabin. <br />Page 16 of 48 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.