My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-13-2017 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2017
>
03-13-2017 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/24/2019 1:45:07 PM
Creation date
5/24/2019 1:21:35 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
563
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORO -NO PLANNING COMMISSION <br />Tuesday, February 21, 2017 <br />6:30 o'clock p.m. <br />Smale stated she has not really thought about signage at this point but that it likely would be located <br />closer to the street. Smale noted the building is pretty visible from the highway but yet set back far <br />enough for child care. <br />Dale Richardson stated it is his understanding the contract for the road project will be let in April and that <br />the median should be removed sometime this year. Richardson stated the signage will probably not be <br />done until after the road work is completed since it is likely it would need to be removed as part of that <br />project. <br />Chair Thiesse opened the public hearing at 7:05 p.m. <br />There were no public comments regarding this application, <br />Chair Thiesse closed the public hearing at 7:05 p.m. <br />Olson stated the concerns raised by Staff are valid but that it seems like a good use for the building. <br />Schoenzeit noted a lot of the regulations regarding daycares are controlled by the state. <br />Thiesse stated his one concern relates to the fire hydrant in the back corner that might get fenced in. <br />Gaffon stated Public Works will need to look at that. <br />Richardson noted it is right on the corner. <br />Thiesse stated if it is fenced in, it would be inaccessible in the event of a fire. Thiesse noted no accessory <br />structures would be allowed on the property. <br />Gaffron stated he would recommend the applicant provide a detailed site plan for how the site will be <br />used. Gaffron stated the initial request was to see whether daycare would be allowed and that a more <br />detailed plan would be required prior to the issuance of a conditional use permit. <br />Page 9 of 48 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.