Laserfiche WebLink
City of Orono <br />To: Melanie Curtis <br />From: Roger Peitso �W <br />CC: Jeremy Barnhart <br />Date: 7/9/2017 <br />Re: 4380 Sixth Avenue North <br />Council <br />Exhibit B <br />#17-3901 <br />Comments: Septic design professionals have identified difficulties in finding a second or <br />alternative treatment site, on the property located at 4380 Sixth Avenue North. <br />City Code Section 58-47 (d) requires a second treatment site and bars the City of <br />Orono from issuing any permits for building expansion or accessory structures <br />without identification of a second treatment site. However, Code Section 58-73 <br />does allow a variance from the requirements of Code Section 58-47 if approved by <br />the On -Site Systems manager (myself), or the City council. <br />The difficulties in finding two septic sites is caused by lack of space on the lot and <br />being able to maintain legal setbacks for the septic sites due to: wetlands on the <br />edges of the property; the size and shape of the lot; and limited areas of <br />undisturbed original soils large enough to support two treatment sites. <br />The current septic system is non-compliant and must be replaced when the <br />property is sold. One Type I Standard five -bedroom site has been identified and a <br />new system will be installed as required by City of Orono Code at the point of sale. <br />This new system should be able to support the needs of the current house, which <br />has three bedrooms, and allow for expansion up to five bedrooms for 40 years or <br />more with proper care and maintenance. <br />if the system were to fail, depending on the cause, it is feasible that the mound <br />could be re -built in the same place using new materials. If failure was due to soils <br />lacking the capacity for treatment, pre-treatment technology could be added to <br />the system allowing the same treatment area to be used. <br />It would be my recommendation that a variance from the two site requirement in <br />Section 58-47 be approved because of the hardship it would cause to the current <br />or future owners of this property, resulting in limited or no options to improve or <br />construct structures on this property which would otherwise be allowed. <br />