My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-27-2017 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2017
>
02-27-2017 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/24/2019 1:12:08 PM
Creation date
5/24/2019 1:04:38 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
234
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, February 13, 2017 <br />7:00 o'clock p.m. <br />Bieker indicated there were numerous inspections done on the property during the construction of the <br />home, pool, and monuments. Bicker stated the person from Denali in charge of this project is no longer <br />with the company and that he cannot answer why it was not brought to the homeowner's attention. <br />Bieker stated things change during the construction process and the monuments were denoted on the <br />surveys that were submitted well in advance of construction and nobody brought it to their attention. <br />Bieker stated they were trying to be forthright and showing what they were doing but no one brought it to <br />their attention that a variance was required. <br />Crosby asked if the monuments were shown on the original plans. <br />Bicker indicated they were not but that there were numerous surveys submitted. The landscaping plan <br />was submitted when the pool permit was pulled. In addition, on the hardcover worksheet it noted <br />proposed monuments as well as on the surveys. <br />Walsh noted the City Council recently reviewed an application where someone constructed an 8 -foot <br />trellis and in that situation the plans appeared to indicate a small wall. Because they did not submit an <br />elevation drawing, it was not clear that there would be an 8 -foot trellis. <br />Crosby asked what the normal setback is. <br />Curtis indicated it should be 10 feet from the paved roadway. Curtis stated this lot is unique in that the <br />lot line goes into the road. <br />Bieker stated they meet the lot line setback but they do not meet the road setback. Bieker stated most <br />roads would have an easement along the road for drainage and utilities and most properties actually do <br />not start until further back. <br />Andersen commented there are people with fences and boulders and monuments already closer than the <br />ten feet. <br />Crosby asked how many other homes in Orono he has constructed. <br />Bieker indicated it is a lot. <br />Walsh stated the inspectors come to a site with a sheet of what to inspect and that they do not look for <br />other items. Walsh stated contractors would not be happy if the inspectors just walked around the site <br />looking at things. <br />Walsh stated this comes down to a practical difficulty. Walsh stated if they would have had a footing <br />inspection, they would have found that out before the monuments were constructed. <br />Bieker indicated he did not know of this until he received the notice and that he did not know he required <br />a separate permit for the monuments. <br />Seals commented she would have thought the builder would have known a permit was required on the <br />electrical alone. <br />Page 10 of 18 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.