Laserfiche WebLink
FILE #17-3901 <br />21 Feb 2017 <br />Page 4 of 4 <br />and has determined that the addition to the home is not likely to impact the existing or future <br />septic sites. However, the current septic system is noncompliant and replacement of the system <br />is triggered by the property sale. The applicant identified one treatment site; a new system will <br />be installed at the point of sale. The applicant was only able to identify one treatment site on <br />the property where two standard sites are required by Code. The City's Code provides the <br />building official with the authority to grant variances from the septic code requirements. In this <br />situation the building official has recommended that the City Council review and rule on the <br />requested septic variance. His recommendation for approval of the variance is attached as <br />Exhibit F. <br />Practical Difficulties Statement <br />Applicant has completed the Practical Difficulties Documentation Form attached as Exhibit B, and <br />should be asked for additional testimony regarding the application. <br />Practical Difficulties Plan Analysis <br />Staff finds the location of the home, affected by the Hennepin County land taking for the road <br />realignment, the septic site limitations, the topography, and the substandard lot area are practical <br />difficulties supporting the front setback variance to allow the second story addition to the home. <br />Engineer Comments <br />There is no proposed grading as part of this project. <br />Public Comments <br />To date, no public comments have been received. <br />Issues for Consideration <br />1. Does the Planning Commission find that that the property owner proposes to use the <br />property in a reasonable manner which is not permitted by an official control? <br />2. Does the Planning Commission find that the variance(s), if granted, will not alter the <br />essential character of the neighborhood? <br />3. Does the Commission find it necessary to impose conditions in order to mitigate the <br />impacts created by the granting of the requested variance(s)? <br />4. Are there any other issues or concerns with this application? <br />Planning Staff Recommendation <br />Planning staff recommends approval of the setback variance. <br />List of Exhibits <br />Exhibit A. Application <br />Exhibit B. Practical Difficulties Documentation Form <br />Exhibit C. Existing & Proposed Survey/Site Plan <br />Exhibit D. Proposed Plans and Elevations <br />Exhibit E. Aerial Photos <br />Exhibit F. Building Official Memo — RE: Septic Variance <br />Exhibit G. Code Sections <br />Exhibit H. Property Owners List <br />Exhibit 1. Plat Map <br />