My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-09-2017 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2017
>
01-09-2017 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/24/2019 12:46:24 PM
Creation date
5/24/2019 12:37:07 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
315
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
CITY OF ORONO <br />RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br />ANALYSIS: <br />NO. <br />1. "Variances shall only be permitted when they are in harmony with the general purposes <br />and intent of the ordinance ...." The applicant proposes to construct a new residence <br />and detached garage on a residential property which is in line with the intent of the <br />ordinance. <br />2. "Variances shall only be permitted . . . when the variances are consistent with the <br />comprehensive plan." In addition to the residential guiding of the Property, the <br />Comprehensive Plan has directives which are put in place to protect the lake, limit massing <br />and hardcover. The proposed plan for a new residence and detached garage results in <br />neither an increase in structural coverage (over the permitted 15% level) nor hardcover <br />above 25%. <br />3. "Variances may be granted when the applicant for the variance establishes that there are <br />practical difficulties in complying with the zoning ordinance. `Practical difficulties,' as used in <br />connection with the granting of a variance, means that: <br />a. The property owner in question proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner, <br />however, the proposed use is not permitted by the official controls. <br />The Applicants propose to construct a new home and detached garage on the <br />Property in conformance with the FEMA floodplain regulations lowest floor and <br />MCWD's lowest opening requirements. In order to do so they are elevating the <br />new structures on fill material. With the lake setbacks applied, the property is not <br />wide enough to meet the requirement that the fill material extend 15 feet from the <br />perimeter at the lowest floor elevation. In staff's opinion, this criterion is met. The <br />detached garage will be constructed in the same footprint location as an existing <br />detached garage. The proposed 3.5 foot increase in peak height is a combination <br />of the owners' proposed 3 foot side wall height increase and the '/2 foot floor <br />elevation required by code. The new home will meet the LR -1 B district setbacks, <br />height, massing, and the property will comply with the Tier 1 hardcover <br />requirements. <br />b. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to his property not created <br />by the landowner. <br />Portions of the Property have a 1 % annual chance of flooding. The Applicants are <br />proposing to elevate the structure in a conforming manner and location to meet the <br />flood regulations; the relative narrowness of the Property creates a difficulty in <br />meeting the 15 -foot fill extension requirement. The location of the existing <br />nonconforming detached garage encroaches 5.7 feet into the rear yard. <br />Shadywood Road and the bridge over the channel are approximately 17 feet <br />higher than grade of the Property. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.