Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, June 25, 2018 <br />7:00 o'clock p.m. <br />14. LA18-55 PAUL VOGSTROM OB/O WILLIAM AND SUE DUNKLEY, 2709 WALTERS <br />PORT LANE, SKETCH PLAN — Continued <br />wanted to live on the lake and that they specifically chose Orono because they felt comfortable in the <br />City's planning process and their protections of the lakeshore. Hueler stated when they lived on Kelly <br />Avenue, they had to adhere very carefully to the average lakeshore setback and that they accepted that. <br />Hueler stated at this point their concerns are that when the property was combined, the Dunkleys were <br />provided a significant number of variances to build the house. Hueler stated the Dunkleys knew if they <br />combined those two parcels, they would have to request a subdivision and that they are simply asking that <br />this situation be treated the same way as other residents have been treated. <br />Greg Hueler stated they have been negatively impacted by this in a host of ways and that the last phone <br />call he had with Mr. Vogstrom was that the majority of the trucks would be using Walters Port. Hueler <br />stated to his understanding there has not been a single truck that has gone up Walters Port and that at <br />times their driveway has been impassable due to mud. Hueler stated there have been a number of times <br />where trucks have blocked their driveway entrance and that it got so bad last week that his son had to call <br />the police. The police indicated they would make sure it does not happen again. Hueler commented these <br />are the things that are immediately impacting them personally. <br />Hueler stated they are most concerned if this gets approved about what it will do for others who want to <br />do the same thing. Hueler stated they are also concerned about the shoreline and questioned why some <br />people are allowed to not follow the rules and build a house in someone's sightline. Hueler noted it was <br />the Dunkleys' choice not to leave the existing house. <br />Kelly Hueler stated the Dunkleys knew that requirement before the house was removed and that the <br />Dunkleys are very experienced in real estate as part of their business. Hueler stated one of their main <br />concerns is that many of the neighbors did not know about the meeting tonight and that they emailed a <br />number of neighbors over the weekend. Hueler commented she understands that many of the neighbors <br />on Walters Port are very supportive of this because they have been promised substantial improvements <br />but that they are here to say that this is not just going to happen to them because there are many houses <br />being built right now around the lake that could request the same thing. Hueler noted those homes, <br />however, did not get variances to go inside those sightlines. Hueler stated if this request is approved, it <br />would set a precedent, which means anyone can request it. <br />Hueler stated they are asking the City Council to give serious consideration to what this means if this <br />proposal is allowed to proceed and go forward. <br />Greg Hueler pointed out that this is a sketch plan and not a formal survey. Hueler stated the proposed lot <br />looks like it has a point, which is absolutely not the case, and that it is a meandering shoreline. Hueler <br />stated the other thing that was brought up is the way the Dunkleys added their addition basically forces <br />the new home to be out by the shoreline, which is the decision they made and is not a hardship. <br />Dankey noted the proposed home is back further, which should help their sightline. <br />Kelly Hueler stated it is a two-story home and it would not help their sightlines. <br />Page 7 of 21 <br />