Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, June 25, 2018 <br />7:00 o'clock p.m. <br />13. LA18-42 — TEXT AMENDMENT: CHAPTERS 78 AND 82 PUBLIC HEARING <br />NOTIFICATION DISTANCE AND SUBDIVISION REQUIREMENTS <br />ORDINANCE NO. 210, THIRD SERIES — Continued <br />Printup commented the ordinance fits in with what the City Council has talked about with communication <br />with the residents and that he is in favor of the ordinance, especially when something controversial is <br />going on in the area. Printup stated it is another tool the City can say that they are trying to let people <br />know what is going on. <br />Crosby indicated he concurs with Council Member Printup but that the Council and Planning <br />Commission will need to weigh the comments. <br />Dankey noted the ordinance would also result in more cost to the applicants. <br />Barnhart stated the fee has been adjusted so the City absorbs those costs and that it would be nominal. <br />Mayor Walsh asked if anyone from the public would like to comment on this item. <br />There were no public comments regarding this application. <br />Printup moved, Seals seconded, to adopt ORDINANCE NO. 210, Third Series, an Ordinance <br />Amending Title IV Land Use Pertaining to Public Hearing Notification Distances, and to approve <br />the summary ordinance, SUMMARY ORDINANCE NO. 211, Third Series. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays <br />0. <br />14. LA18-55 PAUL VOGSTROM O/B/O WILLIAM AND SUE DUNKLEY, 2709 WALTERS <br />PORT LANE, SKETCH PLAN <br />Paul Vogstrom, Applicant, was present. <br />Curtis stated the owners are requesting input on a sketch plan proposing to create a new lakeshore lot <br />between their Walters Port home and the Hueler property at 2715 Pence. Because the property as it exists <br />today results from the recent combination of 2709 Walters Port Land and the recently acquired 2710 <br />Pence Lane property, a subdivision rather than a lot line rearrangement is necessary. <br />This application was discussed last week at the Planning Commission meeting. As proposed, there are a <br />number of unresolved issues, some of which result in nonconformities and the need for variances. The <br />following is a summary of the issues: <br />A. The existing private driveway is conforming as it serves only two homes. The addition of a third <br />lot/home served triggers the Code requirement for a 24 -foot wide, private road within a platted <br />50 -foot outlot, with a 100 -foot cul-de-sac. The applicant is showing a private driveway with two <br />gates and an emergency access connection to Walters Port Lane for police, fire, and ambulance <br />access. This driveway does not meet Code standards to add a third lot. <br />B. Without creation of a platted outlot for a private road, proposed Lot 2 will be a second back lot, <br />where the Code allows for a maximum of one lot to be a back lot. In addition, Lot 2 as shown <br />Page 3 of 21 <br />