Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, June 25, 2018 <br />7:00 o'clock p.m. <br />15. YOUR BOAT CLUB —1444 SHORELINE DRIVE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT — <br />VARIANCE REVIEW — Continued <br />Johnson stated in the triangular section, there was some wood posts with rope going across that entire <br />triangle. The site plan includes language about what can be done in that area. Johnson noted he cannot <br />read it on his copy but that it is something to the effect about temporary storage only. <br />Barnhart stated as per agreement with City, this area is to be used for temp storage, rough surface. <br />Johnson stated that area has been cleaned out so it can be used as a parking spot. The agreement with the <br />City is that it would be used for temporary storage. Johnson noted both of the residential properties have <br />lakeside decks on them, which is not part of the plan, and that maybe a permit along the way was <br />approved allowing them. Johnson noted the deck on the northern most property goes within inches of his <br />property line and would certainly be within the 75 -foot setback. <br />Walsh stated a variance would have been required for those decks. <br />Barnhart stated if variances were issued for those, they were issued to a separate property and not 1444 <br />Shoreline Drive. <br />Walsh commented everything looks spot on with what was done with the exception of the triangle area <br />and the decks on the houses. Walsh suggested they put a walkway through the edges so people can walk <br />through. <br />Barnhart stated it appears in 2011, when Your Boat Club came in with confirmation of parking, that that <br />triangle spot was included in their calculations. <br />Johnson stated it was listed at that time as potential. Johnson stated what was happening at the time of the <br />conditional use permit was the issue of whether the boat club required additional parking just because <br />they are a boat club. The Council decided there was not going to be an additional requirement for <br />parking, so the parking then became moot. Johnson stated it clearly says that area was potential parking <br />and not approved parking in the triangle area. <br />Walsh asked when something goes from potential to actual. Walsh commented he can see it both ways. <br />Mattick stated it is poor wording and that to his understanding that was a spillover parking area. Mattick <br />indicated he will take a look at that. <br />Walsh stated he can see how it can be used if it is needed since it is listed as potential. <br />Luke Kujawa stated when they were going through all this, it was a very long process, and that Mike <br />Gaffron had indicated that the wedge area had been used for parking in the summertime and boat storage <br />in the wintertime for as long as he can possibly remember and that they did not need to address it because <br />there was adequate parking in the other lots. Kujawa stated that area has always been there and that they <br />have used it in an effort to keep parking off the road. <br />Page 19 of 21 <br />